Quadro FX 3800M
VS
Moore Threads MTT S30

Quadro FX 3800M vs Moore Threads MTT S30

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3800M

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS

Moore Threads MTT S30

Core: 1800 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 3800M is positioned at rank 46 and the Moore Threads MTT S30 is on rank 118, so the Quadro FX 3800M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 3800M

#23
Intel Arc Pro B60
MSRP: $500|Avg: $450
97%
#24
Radeon PRO W7600
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
96%
#25
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
MSRP: $625|Avg: $750
96%
#26
Radeon Pro Vega 48
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
88%
#27
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
MSRP: $500|Avg: $280
87%
#31
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
517%
#46
Quadro FX 3800M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#48
Quadro K3100M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $400
100%
#50
Quadro K5000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $509
98%
#51
Radeon PRO W6300
MSRP: $200|Avg: $150
97%
#52
Quadro K4100M
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $261
97%
#58
Quadro K2000M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
88%
#60
Intel Arc Pro A60
MSRP: $380|Avg: $380
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S30

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
688%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
661%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
653%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
652%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
650%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
647%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
639%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
636%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
630%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
629%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
621%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
620%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
609%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
608%
#84
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
93%
#103
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
758%
#118
Moore Threads MTT S30
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
100%
#119
Radeon 535
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#122
GeForce GTS 450
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
98%
#123
Radeon HD 8570D
MSRP: $40|Avg: $15
98%
#125
Radeon HD 8650G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#126
GeForce GT 630
MSRP: $69|Avg: $20
94%
#127
Radeon HD 6770
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
93%
#129
GeForce GT 440
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
92%
#130
Radeon R7 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
92%
#133
Radeon HD 6750
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Quadro FX 3800M is significantly newer (2008 vs 0). The Quadro FX 3800M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S30 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Moore Threads MTT S30 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro FX 3800M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightQuadro FX 3800MMoore Threads MTT S30
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%)
Leading raw performance (+1.4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
MUSA (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Moore Threads MTT S30 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 3800M and Moore Threads MTT S30

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3800M

The Quadro FX 3800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 572 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Moore Threads MTT S30

The Moore Threads MTT S30 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1800 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 580 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3800M scores 572 and the Moore Threads MTT S30 reaches 580 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3800M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Moore Threads MTT S30 uses MUSA, both on 55 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800M) vs 4,096 (Moore Threads MTT S30). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800M) vs 14.75 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S30).

FeatureQuadro FX 3800MMoore Threads MTT S30
G3D Mark Score
572
580+1%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
MUSA
Process Node
55 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
240
4096+1607%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
14.75 TFLOPS+2271%
ROPs
32
256+700%
TMUs
80
256+220%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
4 MB+1500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 3800MMoore Threads MTT S30
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3800M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Moore Threads MTT S30 has 512 MB. The Quadro FX 3800M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3800M) vs 4 MB (Moore Threads MTT S30) — the Moore Threads MTT S30 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800MMoore Threads MTT S30
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
4 MB+1500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800MMoore Threads MTT S30
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 3800M) vs MUSA Gen1 (Moore Threads MTT S30). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs MUSA Gen1. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Quadro FX 3800M) vs H.264,H.265 (Moore Threads MTT S30).

FeatureQuadro FX 3800MMoore Threads MTT S30
Encoder
None
MUSA Gen1
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP2)
MUSA Gen1
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3800M draws 189W versus the Moore Threads MTT S30's 255W — a 29.7% difference. The Quadro FX 3800M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800M) vs 250W (Moore Threads MTT S30). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 145mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800MMoore Threads MTT S30
TDP
189W-26%
255W
Recommended PSU
350W
250W-29%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
None
Length
0mm
145mm
Height
0mm
69mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
90
Perf/Watt
3.0+30%
2.3