Quadro FX 4500 vs Radeon HD 6410D

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 4500 vs Radeon HD 6410D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 4500 vs Radeon HD 6410D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 4500

2008

Why buy it

✅Draws 189W instead of 375W, a 186W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6410D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $70 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6410D

2011

Why buy it

✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌98.4% higher power demand at 375W vs 189W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6410D is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 4.4% in PassMark G3D (237 vs 227), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 4500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6410D makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6410D is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 4500 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 4500 vs Radeon HD 6410D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 4500

The Quadro FX 4500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 227 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 6410D

The Radeon HD 6410D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 237 points. Launch price was $699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 4500 scores 227 and the Radeon HD 6410D reaches 237 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 4500 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6410D uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 4500) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6410D). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 4500) vs 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6410D).

Feature	Quadro FX 4500	Radeon HD 6410D
G3D Mark Score	227	237+4%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	TeraScale 3
Process Node	55 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	240	1536 ×2+540%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	2.55 TFLOPS ×2+310%
ROPs	32	32 ×2
TMUs	80	96 ×2+20%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 4500	Radeon HD 6410D
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 4500 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6410D. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 4500) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6410D) — the Radeon HD 6410D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 4500	Radeon HD 6410D
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 4500 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 6410D's 375W — a 66% difference. The Quadro FX 4500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 4500) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6410D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 4500	Radeon HD 6410D
TDP	189W-50%	375W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	230mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	1.2+100%	0.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 4500 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 6410D launched at $70. On MSRP, Quadro FX 4500 was 100+% cheaper ($70 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro FX 4500) vs 3.4 (Radeon HD 6410D) — the Quadro FX 4500 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 6410D (2011 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 4500	Radeon HD 6410D
MSRP	$0-100%	$70
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	3.4
Codename	GT200B	Antilles
Release	November 11 2008	March 8 2011
Ranking	#815	#583

Search Quadro FX 4500 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6410D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.