Quadro K1100M vs RadeonT 610M

CPU

GPU

Quadro K1100M

2013Core: 706 MHz

RadeonT 610M

2023Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

Quadro K1100M

1,089

+2.0%

GeForce GTX 1070 (móvel)

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

GeForce RTX 4060

RadeonT 610M

1,068

0.0%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K1100M is positioned at rank 109 and the RadeonT 610M is on rank 232, so the Quadro K1100M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro K1100M

#57

Quadro RTX 3000

MSRP: $800|Avg: $891

100%

#58

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1700

97%

#59

Radeon Vega Frontier Edition

MSRP: $999|Avg: $150

94%

#60

Radeon Pro WX 8200

MSRP: $999|Avg: $350

93%

#62

RTX A4500

MSRP: $1699|Avg: $800

91%

#63

RTX 4500 Ada Generation

MSRP: $2250|Avg: $2000

91%

#94

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

1085%

#109

Quadro K1100M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#111

Quadro P520

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

100%

#113

Radeon Pro WX 3100

MSRP: $199|Avg: $65

95%

#117

Radeon Pro 580X

MSRP: $600|Avg: $200

92%

#118

Radeon Pro WX 2100

MSRP: $149|Avg: $45

92%

#119

CMP 40HX

MSRP: $699|Avg: $120

92%

#124

Radeon Pro W5500X

MSRP: $599|Avg: $500

90%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RadeonT 610M

#53

Radeon RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

99%

#54

Radeon RX 6800S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

91%

#222

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

498%

#224

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

451%

#225

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

450%

#229

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

409%

#230

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

407%

#232

RadeonT 610M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#235

Radeon RX 540

MSRP: $99|Avg: $40

99%

#236

Radeon HD 6750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $60

98%

#237

Radeon HD 7570M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $15

97%

#239

GeForce MX570 A

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

95%

#240

Arc Graphics 130T

MSRP: $300|Avg: $250

95%

#242

GeForce GT 645

MSRP: $99|Avg: $15

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RadeonT 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2013). The RadeonT 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro K1100M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro K1100M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RadeonT 610M.

Insight	Quadro K1100M	RadeonT 610M
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+300%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K1100M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro K1100M Benchmark Check

RadeonT 610M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K1100M and RadeonT 610M

Quadro K1100M

The Quadro K1100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,089 points. Launch price was $109.94.

RadeonT 610M

The RadeonT 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,068 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K1100M scores 1,089 and the RadeonT 610M reaches 1,068 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K1100M is built on Kepler while the RadeonT 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K1100M) vs 128 (RadeonT 610M). Raw compute: 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro K1100M) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RadeonT 610M).

Feature	Quadro K1100M	RadeonT 610M
G3D Mark Score	1,089+2%	1,068
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	384+200%	128
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5422 TFLOPS	0.5632 TFLOPS+4%
ROPs	16+300%	4
TMUs	32+300%	8
L1 Cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K1100M	RadeonT 610M
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K1100M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 610M has 512 MB. The Quadro K1100M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro K1100M) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 610M) — the RadeonT 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K1100M	RadeonT 610M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K1100M) vs 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 610M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro K1100M	RadeonT 610M
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Quadro K1100M) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 610M). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K1100M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 610M).

Feature	Quadro K1100M	RadeonT 610M
Encoder	1st Gen NVENC	VCN 3.0
Decoder	1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K1100M draws 45W versus the RadeonT 610M's 15W — a 100% difference. The RadeonT 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K1100M) vs 350W (RadeonT 610M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.