Quadro K1100M vs RadeonT 610M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K1100M vs RadeonT 610M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K1100M vs RadeonT 610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K1100M

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT 610M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

RadeonT 610M

2023

Why buy it

✅44.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RadeonT 610M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 44.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro K1100M instead at 1,089 vs 1,068, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RadeonT 610M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, 2 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RadeonT 610M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro K1100M vs RadeonT 610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K1100M

The Quadro K1100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,089 points. Launch price was $109.94.

RadeonT 610M

The RadeonT 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,068 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K1100M scores 1,089 and the RadeonT 610M reaches 1,068 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K1100M is built on Kepler while the RadeonT 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K1100M) vs 128 (RadeonT 610M). Raw compute: 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro K1100M) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (RadeonT 610M).

Feature	Quadro K1100M	RadeonT 610M
G3D Mark Score	1,089+2%	1,068
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	384+200%	128
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5422 TFLOPS	0.5632 TFLOPS+4%
ROPs	16+300%	4
TMUs	32+300%	8
L1 Cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K1100M	RadeonT 610M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K1100M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT 610M carries 512 MB. Quadro K1100M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K1100M and 64-bit on the RadeonT 610M. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro K1100M) vs 2 MB (RadeonT 610M) — the RadeonT 610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K1100M	RadeonT 610M
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+300%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	2 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K1100M) vs 12 (12_2) (RadeonT 610M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Quadro K1100M	RadeonT 610M
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_2)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Quadro K1100M) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT 610M). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K1100M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG (RadeonT 610M).

Feature	Quadro K1100M	RadeonT 610M
Encoder	1st Gen NVENC	VCN 3.0
Decoder	1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,JPEG

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K1100M draws 45W versus the RadeonT 610M's 15W — a 100% difference. The RadeonT 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K1100M) vs 350W (RadeonT 610M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.