HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro K1100M

HD Graphics 630

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro K1100M

2013Core: 706 MHz
Similar parts
·······

HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro K1100M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro K1100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

HD Graphics 630

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
  • More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quadro K1100M

2013

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • HD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro K1100M is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
HD Graphics 630 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2% in PassMark G3D (1,111 vs 1,089), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro K1100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
HD Graphics 630 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, HD Graphics 630 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K1100M has the stronger long-term case.

HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro K1100M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

HD Graphics 630

The HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,111 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro K1100M

The Quadro K1100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,089 points. Launch price was $109.94.

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 630 scores 1,111 and the Quadro K1100M reaches 1,089 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro K1100M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 630) vs 384 (Quadro K1100M). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 630) vs 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro K1100M).

FeatureHD Graphics 630Quadro K1100M
G3D Mark Score
1,111+2%
1,089
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Kepler
Process Node
14 nm++
28 nm
Shading Units
192
384+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.384 TFLOPS
0.5422 TFLOPS+41%
ROPs
3
16+433%
TMUs
24
32+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureHD Graphics 630Quadro K1100M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 630 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro K1100M carries 2 GB. Quadro K1100M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics 630 and 64-bit on the Quadro K1100M.

FeatureHD Graphics 630Quadro K1100M
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the Quadro K1100M's 45W — a 100% difference. The HD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 630) vs 350W (Quadro K1100M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureHD Graphics 630Quadro K1100M
TDP
15W-67%
45W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
74.1+206%
24.2
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is HD Graphics 630 (2017 vs 2013).

FeatureHD Graphics 630Quadro K1100M
MSRP
$100
Codename
Kaby Lake GT2
GK107
Release
January 1 2017
July 23 2013
Ranking
#823
#856

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.