HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R9 M275

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R9 M275 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R9 M275: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

HD Graphics 630

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 198.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 3.7 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M275

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅HD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R9 M275 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
200% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.7 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M275 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (1,115 vs 1,111), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R9 M275 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

HD Graphics 630 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 198.9% (11.1 vs 3.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, HD Graphics 630 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon R9 M275 has the stronger long-term case.

HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R9 M275 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

HD Graphics 630

The HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,111 points.

Radeon R9 M275

The Radeon R9 M275 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $799.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 630 scores 1,111 and the Radeon R9 M275 reaches 1,115 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R9 M275 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 630) vs 640 (Radeon R9 M275). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 630) vs 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 925 MHz.

Feature	HD Graphics 630	Radeon R9 M275
G3D Mark Score	1,111	1,115
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm++	28 nm
Shading Units	192	640+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.384 TFLOPS	1.184 TFLOPS+208%
Boost Clock	1000 MHz+8%	925 MHz
ROPs	3	16+433%
TMUs	24	40+67%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	HD Graphics 630	Radeon R9 M275
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 630 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M275 carries 512 MB. Radeon R9 M275 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics 630 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M275.

Feature	HD Graphics 630	Radeon R9 M275
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	64 GB/s
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the Radeon R9 M275's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The HD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 630) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M275). Power connectors: Integrated vs Mobile.

Feature	HD Graphics 630	Radeon R9 M275
TDP	15W-80%	75W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	Mobile
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	74.1+397%	14.9

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the HD Graphics 630 came in at $100, while the Radeon R9 M275 launched at $300. On MSRP, HD Graphics 630 was 66.7% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.1 (HD Graphics 630) vs 3.7 (Radeon R9 M275) — the HD Graphics 630 offers 200% better value. The newer card here is HD Graphics 630 (2017 vs 2014).

Feature	HD Graphics 630	Radeon R9 M275
MSRP	$100-67%	$300
Performance per Dollar	11.1+200%	3.7
Codename	Kaby Lake GT2	Venus
Release	January 1 2017	January 28 2014
Ranking	#823	#851

Search HD Graphics 630 on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M275 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.