
HD Graphics 630

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
HD Graphics 630 vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
HD Graphics 630 vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
HD Graphics 630 vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
HD Graphics 630
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌275% higher power demand at 15W vs 4W.
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
2021Why buy it
- ✅HD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 4W instead of 15W, a 11W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Gen. 11 (2021) on 10nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
HD Graphics 630 vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

HD Graphics 630
The HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,111 points.

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 11 2021. It features the Gen. 11 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 800 MHz. It has 24 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 4W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics 630 scores 1,111 and the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) reaches 1,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) uses Gen. 11, both on 14 nm++ vs 10 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 630) vs 24 (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 800 MHz.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,111+1% | 1,100 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Gen. 11 |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 10 nm |
| Shading Units | 192+700% | 24 |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz+25% | 800 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 0 MB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics 630 and System on the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU).
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)'s 4W — a 115.8% difference. The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 630) vs 1W (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 4W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 74.1 | 275.0+271% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the HD Graphics 630 came in at $100, while the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) launched at $0. On MSRP, UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.1 (HD Graphics 630) vs Infinity (UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)) — the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | Gen. 11 |
| Release | January 1 2017 | January 11 2021 |
| Ranking | #823 | #918 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















