CPU
GPU
HD Graphics 630
Popular choices:
Radeon 610M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The HD Graphics 630 is positioned at rank 350 and the Radeon 610M is on rank 346, so the Radeon 610M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar HD Graphics 630
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 610M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 610M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The Radeon 610M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The HD Graphics 630 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 610M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics 630.
| Insight | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 610M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 630 and Radeon 610M
HD Graphics 630
The HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,111 points.
Radeon 610M
The Radeon 610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 128 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,157 points.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics 630 scores 1,111 and the Radeon 610M reaches 1,157 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon 610M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 5 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 630) vs 128 (Radeon 610M). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 630) vs 0.5632 TFLOPS (Radeon 610M). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 2200 MHz.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,111 | 1,157+4% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 192+50% | 128 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 0.5632 TFLOPS+47% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 2200 MHz+120% |
| ROPs | 3 | 4+33% |
| TMUs | 24+200% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics 630 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 610M has 512 MB. The Radeon 610M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the Radeon 610M's 15W — a 0% difference. The Radeon 610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 630) vs 350W (Radeon 610M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 15W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 74.1 | 77.1+4% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 610M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon 610M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | Dragon Range |
| Release | January 1 2017 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #823 | #843 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on HD Graphics 630 and Radeon 610M
