CPU
GPU
HD Graphics 630
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The HD Graphics 630 is positioned at rank 350 and the Radeon HD 4850 X2 is on rank 291, so the Radeon HD 4850 X2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar HD Graphics 630
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4850 X2
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The HD Graphics 630 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2008). The HD Graphics 630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 4850 X2 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics 630.
| Insight | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The HD Graphics 630 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the HD Graphics 630 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $40), it costs 25% less, resulting in a 30.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+30.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 630 and Radeon HD 4850 X2
HD Graphics 630
The HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,111 points.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 7 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,132 points. Launch price was $420.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics 630 scores 1,111 and the Radeon HD 4850 X2 reaches 1,132 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm++ vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 630) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 630) vs 1 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 4850 X2).
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,111 | 1,132+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 800 ×2+317% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 1 TFLOPS ×2+160% |
| ROPs | 3 | 16 ×2+433% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40 ×2+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics 630 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 4850 X2 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 4850 X2's 250W — a 177.4% difference. The HD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 630) vs 500W (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-94% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 95 |
| Perf/Watt | 74.1+1547% | 4.5 |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics 630 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 launched at $399 and now averages $40. The HD Graphics 630 costs 25% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.0 (HD Graphics 630) vs 28.3 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) — the HD Graphics 630 offers 30.7% better value. The HD Graphics 630 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2008).
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Radeon HD 4850 X2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-75% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-25% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.0+31% | 28.3 |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | R700 |
| Release | January 1 2017 | November 7 2008 |
| Ranking | #823 | #848 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on HD Graphics 630 and Radeon HD 4850 X2
