HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2

HD Graphics 630

2017Core: 350 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 4850 X2

2008Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······

HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

HD Graphics 630

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $299 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 291.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 2.8 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Draws 15W instead of 250W, a 235W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 4850 X2

2008

Why buy it

  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
  • HD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 4850 X2 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 299% HIGHER MSRP
    $399 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.8 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 1566.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 4850 X2 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (1,132 vs 1,111), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 4850 X2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
HD Graphics 630 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $299 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 291.6% (11.1 vs 2.8), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, HD Graphics 630 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 4850 X2 has the stronger long-term case.

HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

HD Graphics 630

The HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,111 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 4850 X2

The Radeon HD 4850 X2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 7 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,132 points. Launch price was $420.

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 630 scores 1,111 and the Radeon HD 4850 X2 reaches 1,132 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses TeraScale, both on 14 nm++ vs 55 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 630) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 630) vs 1 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 4850 X2).

FeatureHD Graphics 630Radeon HD 4850 X2
G3D Mark Score
1,111
1,132+2%
Architecture
Generation 9.5
TeraScale
Process Node
14 nm++
55 nm
Shading Units
192
800 ×2+317%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.384 TFLOPS
1 TFLOPS ×2+160%
ROPs
3
16 ×2+433%
TMUs
24
40 ×2+67%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureHD Graphics 630Radeon HD 4850 X2
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 630 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 4850 X2 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics 630 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4850 X2.

FeatureHD Graphics 630Radeon HD 4850 X2
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
1 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 4850 X2's 250W — a 177.4% difference. The HD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 630) vs 500W (Radeon HD 4850 X2). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin.

FeatureHD Graphics 630Radeon HD 4850 X2
TDP
15W-94%
250W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
500W
Power Connector
Integrated
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
95
Perf/Watt
74.1+1547%
4.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the HD Graphics 630 came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 4850 X2 launched at $399. On MSRP, HD Graphics 630 was 74.9% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.1 (HD Graphics 630) vs 2.8 (Radeon HD 4850 X2) — the HD Graphics 630 offers 296.4% better value. The newer card here is HD Graphics 630 (2017 vs 2008).

FeatureHD Graphics 630Radeon HD 4850 X2
MSRP
$100-75%
$399
Performance per Dollar
11.1+296%
2.8
Codename
Kaby Lake GT2
R700
Release
January 1 2017
November 7 2008
Ranking
#823
#848

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.