HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R7 A8-7690K

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R7 A8-7690K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R7 A8-7690K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

HD Graphics 630

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 100W, a 85W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
25% HIGHER MSRP
$100 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.1 vs 14.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Radeon R7 A8-7690K

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅Delivers 28.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.3 vs 11.1 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
✅HD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon R7 A8-7690K is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌566.7% higher power demand at 100W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 A8-7690K is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (1,141 vs 1,111), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon R7 A8-7690K is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs Unknown of VRAM and the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 A8-7690K makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 cheaper on MSRP at $80 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 28.4% (14.3 vs 11.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

HD Graphics 630 vs Radeon R7 A8-7690K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

HD Graphics 630

The HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,111 points.

Radeon R7 A8-7690K

The Radeon R7 A8-7690K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,141 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 630 scores 1,111 and the Radeon R7 A8-7690K reaches 1,141 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon R7 A8-7690K uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 630) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 630) vs 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 975 MHz.

Feature	HD Graphics 630	Radeon R7 A8-7690K
G3D Mark Score	1,111	1,141+3%
Architecture	Generation 9.5	GCN 1.0
Process Node	14 nm++	28 nm
Shading Units	192	1024+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.384 TFLOPS	1.997 TFLOPS+420%
Boost Clock	1000 MHz+3%	975 MHz
ROPs	3	32+967%
TMUs	24	64+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	HD Graphics 630	Radeon R7 A8-7690K
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 630 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 A8-7690K carries 512 MB. Radeon R7 A8-7690K gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics 630 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 A8-7690K.

Feature	HD Graphics 630	Radeon R7 A8-7690K
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the Radeon R7 A8-7690K's 100W — a 147.8% difference. The HD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 630) vs 350W (Radeon R7 A8-7690K). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

Feature	HD Graphics 630	Radeon R7 A8-7690K
TDP	15W-85%	100W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	74.1+550%	11.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the HD Graphics 630 came in at $100, while the Radeon R7 A8-7690K launched at $80. On MSRP, Radeon R7 A8-7690K was 20% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.1 (HD Graphics 630) vs 14.3 (Radeon R7 A8-7690K) — the Radeon R7 A8-7690K offers 28.8% better value. The newer card here is HD Graphics 630 (2017 vs 2015).

Feature	HD Graphics 630	Radeon R7 A8-7690K
MSRP	$100	$80-20%
Performance per Dollar	11.1	14.3+29%
Codename	Kaby Lake GT2	Trinidad
Release	January 1 2017	June 18 2015
Ranking	#823	#467

Search HD Graphics 630 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 A8-7690K on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.