CPU
GPU
HD Graphics 630
Popular choices:
Quadro 2100M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The HD Graphics 630 is positioned at rank 350 and the Quadro 2100M is on rank 107, so the Quadro 2100M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar HD Graphics 630
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2100M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The HD Graphics 630 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 2100M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the HD Graphics 630 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 630 and Quadro 2100M
HD Graphics 630
The HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,111 points.
Quadro 2100M
The Quadro 2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points. Launch price was $84.95.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics 630 scores 1,111 and the Quadro 2100M reaches 1,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro 2100M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 630) vs 576 (Quadro 2100M). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 630) vs 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro 2100M).
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,111+1% | 1,100 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 576+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 0.7684 TFLOPS+100% |
| ROPs | 3 | 16+433% |
| TMUs | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics 630 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2100M has 4 GB. The Quadro 2100M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the Quadro 2100M's 55W — a 114.3% difference. The HD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 630) vs 350W (Quadro 2100M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-73% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 74.1+270% | 20.0 |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics 630 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | — |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | GK106 |
| Release | January 1 2017 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #823 | #788 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on HD Graphics 630 and Quadro 2100M
