HD Graphics 630
Quadro 2100M
HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro 2100M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro 2100M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro 2100M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
HD Graphics 630
2017Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 55W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Generation 9.5 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quadro 2100M
2013Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅HD Graphics 630 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro 2100M is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ❌266.7% higher power demand at 55W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
HD Graphics 630 vs Quadro 2100M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
HD Graphics 630
The HD Graphics 630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 1 2017. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,111 points.
Quadro 2100M
The Quadro 2100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 667 MHz. It has 576 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,100 points. Launch price was $84.95.
Graphics Performance
The HD Graphics 630 scores 1,111 and the Quadro 2100M reaches 1,100 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Quadro 2100M uses Kepler, both on 14 nm++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 630) vs 576 (Quadro 2100M). Raw compute: 0.384 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 630) vs 0.7684 TFLOPS (Quadro 2100M).
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,111+1% | 1,100 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 576+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.384 TFLOPS | 0.7684 TFLOPS+100% |
| ROPs | 3 | 16+433% |
| TMUs | 24 | 48+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics 630 has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2100M carries 4 GB. Quadro 2100M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the HD Graphics 630 and 64-bit on the Quadro 2100M.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics 630 draws 15W versus the Quadro 2100M's 55W — a 114.3% difference. The HD Graphics 630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 630) vs 350W (Quadro 2100M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-73% | 55W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 74.1+270% | 20.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is HD Graphics 630 (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | HD Graphics 630 | Quadro 2100M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Codename | Kaby Lake GT2 | GK106 |
| Release | January 1 2017 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #823 | #788 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on HD Graphics 630 and Quadro 2100M
