Quadro P4200 Max-Q vs FirePro W9100
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Popular choices:
FirePro W9100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is positioned at rank 12 and the FirePro W9100 is on rank 299, so the Quadro P4200 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W9100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W9100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W9100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (275mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P4200 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro P4200 Max-Q and FirePro W9100
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1480 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,800 points.
FirePro W9100
The FirePro W9100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 26 2014. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 930 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,748 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q scores 7,800 and the FirePro W9100 reaches 7,748 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is built on Pascal while the FirePro W9100 uses GCN 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 2,816 (FirePro W9100). Raw compute: 6.82 TFLOPS (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 5.238 TFLOPS (FirePro W9100).
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,800 | 7,748 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2816+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.82 TFLOPS+30% | 5.238 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 176+22% |
| L1 Cache | 864 KB+23% | 704 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro W9100 has 16 GB. The FirePro W9100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 1 MB (FirePro W9100) — the Quadro P4200 Max-Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 12 (FirePro W9100). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W9100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs H.264 (FirePro W9100).
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q draws 100W versus the FirePro W9100's 275W — a 93.3% difference. The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro P4200 Max-Q) vs 350W (FirePro W9100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 275mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-64% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 275mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 93 |
| Perf/Watt | 78.0+177% | 28.2 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Quadro P4200 Max-Q | FirePro W9100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $4000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $200 |
| Codename | GP104 | Hawaii |
| Release | February 21 2018 | March 26 2014 |
| Ranking | #234 | #328 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P4200 Max-Q and FirePro W9100
