Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU
Radeon HD 3300
Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU vs Radeon HD 3300 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU vs Radeon HD 3300 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU vs Radeon HD 3300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 7W instead of 186W, a 179W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Unknown architecture on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $30 MSRP).
Radeon HD 3300
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs Unknown).
- ✅Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon HD 3300 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌2557.1% higher power demand at 186W vs 7W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU vs Radeon HD 3300 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 129 points.
Radeon HD 3300
The Radeon HD 3300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 127 points. Launch price was $180.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU scores 129 and the Radeon HD 3300 reaches 127 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 129+2% | 127 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 40 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU has 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3300 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 3300 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3300.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3300). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+20% | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon HD 3300's 186W — a 185.5% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3300). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-96% | 186W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 18.4+2529% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 3300 launched at $30. On MSRP, Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU was 100+% cheaper ($30 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU) vs 4.2 (Radeon HD 3300) — the Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU (2018 vs 2011).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU | Radeon HD 3300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $30 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 4.2 |
| Codename | — | Cayman |
| Release | December 6 2018 | December 1 2011 |
| Ranking | #915 | #598 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Qualcomm Adreno 618 GPU and Radeon HD 3300
