Radeon 520 vs GRID M10-0B
Radeon 520
Popular choices:
GRID M10-0B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 520 is positioned at rank 112 and the GRID M10-0B is on rank 403, so the Radeon 520 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 520
Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0B
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M10-0B.
| Insight | Radeon 520 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 520 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon 520 holds the technical lead. Priced at $78 (vs $1,000), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1186.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 520 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1186.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($78) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 520 and GRID M10-0B
Radeon 520
The Radeon 520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 874 points. Launch price was $79.
GRID M10-0B
The GRID M10-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 871 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 520 scores 874 and the GRID M10-0B reaches 871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 520 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GRID M10-0B uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 520) vs 640 (GRID M10-0B). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 520) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0B). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 520 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 874 | 871 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 640+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 1183 MHz | 1306 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 320 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 520 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon 520) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-0B) — the GRID M10-0B has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 520 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 520 draws 50W versus the GRID M10-0B's 225W — a 127.3% difference. The Radeon 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon 520) vs 350W (GRID M10-0B). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon 520 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-78% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 17.5+349% | 3.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 520 launched at $78 MSRP and currently averages $78, while the GRID M10-0B launched at $4000 and now averages $1000. The Radeon 520 costs 92.2% less ($922 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.2 (Radeon 520) vs 0.9 (GRID M10-0B) — the Radeon 520 offers 1144.4% better value. The Radeon 520 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon 520 | GRID M10-0B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $78-98% | $4000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $78-92% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.2+1144% | 0.9 |
| Codename | Lexa | GM107 |
| Release | April 20 2017 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #668 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 520 and GRID M10-0B
