Radeon 520
VS
HD Graphics 520

Radeon 520 vs HD Graphics 520

AMD

Radeon 520

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
VS

HD Graphics 520

2015Core: 300 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 520 is positioned at rank 112 and the HD Graphics 520 is on rank 389, so the Radeon 520 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 520

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
647%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
622%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
614%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
613%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
612%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
609%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
601%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
599%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
593%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
592%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
584%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
583%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
573%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
572%
#84
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
88%
#97
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
714%
#112
Radeon 520
MSRP: $78|Avg: $78
100%
#113
Radeon HD 4810
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
99%
#115
GeForce 605
MSRP: $30|Avg: $30
98%
#116
Radeon HD 8410G
MSRP: $40|Avg: $5
97%
#117
RADEON HD6530D
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
95%
#118
Moore Threads MTT S30
MSRP: $55|Avg: $55
94%
#119
Radeon 535
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
94%
#122
GeForce GTS 450
MSRP: $129|Avg: $20
92%
#123
Radeon HD 8570D
MSRP: $40|Avg: $15
92%
#125
Radeon HD 8650G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
89%
#126
GeForce GT 630
MSRP: $69|Avg: $20
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar HD Graphics 520

#379
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1261%
#381
1143%
#382
1140%
#386
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1037%
#387
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1030%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
100%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
99%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
98%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
98%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
96%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#400
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
93%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
93%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
92%
#403
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
91%
#404
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 520 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics 520.

InsightRadeon 520HD Graphics 520
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The HD Graphics 520 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the HD Graphics 520 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $78), it costs 55% less, resulting in a 119.5% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon 520HD Graphics 520
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+119.5%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($78)
More affordable ($35)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 520 and HD Graphics 520

AMD

Radeon 520

The Radeon 520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 874 points. Launch price was $79.

Intel

HD Graphics 520

The HD Graphics 520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 861 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 520 scores 874 and the HD Graphics 520 reaches 861 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 520 is built on GCN 4.0 while the HD Graphics 520 uses Generation 9.0, both on 14 nm vs 14 nm+. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 520) vs 192 (HD Graphics 520). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon 520) vs 0.3456 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 520). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 900 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 520HD Graphics 520
G3D Mark Score
874+2%
861
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Generation 9.0
Process Node
14 nm
14 nm+
Shading Units
512+167%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.211 TFLOPS+250%
0.3456 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1183 MHz+31%
900 MHz
ROPs
16+433%
3
TMUs
32+33%
24

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 520HD Graphics 520
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 520 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the HD Graphics 520 has 0 MB. The Radeon 520 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.

FeatureRadeon 520HD Graphics 520
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 520 draws 50W versus the HD Graphics 520's 15W — a 107.7% difference. The HD Graphics 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon 520) vs 1W (HD Graphics 520). Power connectors: None vs Integrated.

FeatureRadeon 520HD Graphics 520
TDP
50W
15W-70%
Recommended PSU
250W
1W-100%
Power Connector
None
Integrated
Perf/Watt
17.5
57.4+228%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 520 launched at $78 MSRP and currently averages $78, while the HD Graphics 520 launched at $100 and now averages $35. The HD Graphics 520 costs 55.1% less ($43 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.2 (Radeon 520) vs 24.6 (HD Graphics 520) — the HD Graphics 520 offers 119.6% better value. The Radeon 520 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureRadeon 520HD Graphics 520
MSRP
$78-22%
$100
Avg Price (30d)
$78
$35-55%
Performance per Dollar
11.2
24.6+120%
Codename
Lexa
Skylake GT2
Release
April 20 2017
September 1 2015
Ranking
#668
#929