Radeon 535DX vs Radeon R7 M270

AMD

Radeon 535DX

2019Core: 1082 MHzBoost: 1218 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 M270

2014Core: 900 MHzBoost: 940 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon 535DX vs Radeon R7 M270 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 535DX vs Radeon R7 M270 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 535DX vs Radeon R7 M270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 535DX

2019

Why buy it

  • 34.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $100 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Delivers 49.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.9 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
  • Radeon R7 M270 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 535DX is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon R7 M270

2014

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon 535DX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 50% HIGHER MSRP
    $300 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 3.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • 50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 535DX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 34.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon R7 M270 instead at 775 vs 774, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 535DX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 535DX makes the most sense to buy today. It is $100 cheaper on MSRP at $200 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 49.8% (3.9 vs 2.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon 535DX vs Radeon R7 M270 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 535DX

The Radeon 535DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 774 points.

AMD

Radeon R7 M270

The Radeon R7 M270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 11 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 940 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 535DX scores 774 and the Radeon R7 M270 reaches 775 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 535DX is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 M270 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 535DX) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M270). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 535DX) vs 0.7219 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M270). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 940 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 535DXRadeon R7 M270
G3D Mark Score
774
775
Architecture
GCN 4.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
512+33%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.247 TFLOPS+73%
0.7219 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1218 MHz+30%
940 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
32+33%
24
L1 Cache
128 KB+33%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 535DXRadeon R7 M270
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 535DX and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M270. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon 535DX) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 M270) — the Radeon 535DX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 535DXRadeon R7 M270
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 535DX draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 M270's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 535DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 535DX) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M270). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.

FeatureRadeon 535DXRadeon R7 M270
TDP
50W-33%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
Mobile
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
15.5+50%
10.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 535DX came in at $200, while the Radeon R7 M270 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon 535DX was 33.3% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.9 (Radeon 535DX) vs 2.6 (Radeon R7 M270) — the Radeon 535DX offers 50% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 535DX (2019 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon 535DXRadeon R7 M270
MSRP
$200-33%
$300
Performance per Dollar
3.9+50%
2.6
Codename
Lexa
Topaz
Release
March 27 2019
June 11 2014
Ranking
#772
#897

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.