
Radeon 535DX

Radeon R7 M270
Radeon 535DX vs Radeon R7 M270 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon 535DX vs Radeon R7 M270 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon 535DX vs Radeon R7 M270: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon 535DX
2019Why buy it
- ✅34.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $100 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 49.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.9 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ✅Radeon R7 M270 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 535DX is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon R7 M270
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 535DX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌50% HIGHER MSRP$300 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 3.9 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 535DX vs Radeon R7 M270 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 535DX
The Radeon 535DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 774 points.

Radeon R7 M270
The Radeon R7 M270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 11 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 940 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 775 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 535DX scores 774 and the Radeon R7 M270 reaches 775 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 535DX is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 M270 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 535DX) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M270). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 535DX) vs 0.7219 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M270). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 940 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 535DX | Radeon R7 M270 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 774 | 775 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS+73% | 0.7219 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz+30% | 940 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+33% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 535DX | Radeon R7 M270 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 535DX and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M270. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon 535DX) vs 256 KB (Radeon R7 M270) — the Radeon 535DX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 535DX | Radeon R7 M270 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 535DX draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 M270's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 535DX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 535DX) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M270). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon 535DX | Radeon R7 M270 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 15.5+50% | 10.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon 535DX came in at $200, while the Radeon R7 M270 launched at $300. On MSRP, Radeon 535DX was 33.3% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.9 (Radeon 535DX) vs 2.6 (Radeon R7 M270) — the Radeon 535DX offers 50% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 535DX (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon 535DX | Radeon R7 M270 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200-33% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.9+50% | 2.6 |
| Codename | Lexa | Topaz |
| Release | March 27 2019 | June 11 2014 |
| Ranking | #772 | #897 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














