
Radeon 680M vs GeForce GTX 1060

Radeon 680M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 680M is positioned at rank #331 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 680M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 680M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2016). The Radeon 680M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 162.4% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (6 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 680M.
| Insight | Radeon 680M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-162.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+162.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $80 for the Radeon 680M, it costs 25% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 249.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 680M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+249.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 680M and GeForce GTX 1060

Radeon 680M
The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.

GeForce GTX 1060
The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon 680M scores 3,836 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 162.4%. The Radeon 680M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 680M) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,836 | 10,064+162% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2560+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.379 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+163% |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+27% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 160+233% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 960 KB+275% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 680M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 680M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Radeon 680M) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1060). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.1 (Radeon 680M) vs NVENC (Pascal) (GeForce GTX 1060). Decoder: VCN 3.1 vs NVDEC (Pascal).
| Feature | Radeon 680M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.1 | NVENC (Pascal) |
| Decoder | VCN 3.1 | NVDEC (Pascal) |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 680M draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 113% difference. The Radeon 680M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 680M) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 173mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-72% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-13% | 400W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 173mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 76.7+37% | 55.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 costs 25% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 48.0 (Radeon 680M) vs 167.7 (GeForce GTX 1060) — the GeForce GTX 1060 offers 249.4% better value. The Radeon 680M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon 680M | GeForce GTX 1060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | $60-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 48.0 | 167.7+249% |
| Codename | Rembrandt+ | GP104 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | May 27 2016 |
| Ranking | #512 | #137 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















