Radeon 680M vs T400 4GB

AMD

Radeon 680M

2023Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2200 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

T400 4GB

2021Core: 420 MHzBoost: 1425 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon 680M vs T400 4GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 680M vs T400 4GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 680M

2023

Why buy it

  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Measures 1mm instead of 156mm, a 155mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
  • More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.

T400 4GB

2021

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 15500% longer card at 156mm vs 1mm.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 680M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (3,836 vs 3,803), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 680M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 12nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2021. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
T400 4GB makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, T400 4GB is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 680M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 680M vs T400 4GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 680M

The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.

T400 4GB

The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 680M scores 3,836 and the T400 4GB reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 680M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 680M) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1425 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 680MT400 4GB
G3D Mark Score
3,836
3,803
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Turing
Process Node
6 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
768+100%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS+209%
1.094 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2200 MHz+54%
1425 MHz
ROPs
32+100%
16
TMUs
48+100%
24
L1 Cache
256 KB
384 KB+50%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 680MT400 4GB
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 680M and 64-bit on the T400 4GB. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 680M) vs 1 MB (T400 4GB) — the Radeon 680M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 680MT400 4GB
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_2 (Radeon 680M) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon 680MT400 4GB
DirectX
12_2
12_0
Max Displays
0
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.1 (Radeon 680M) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: VCN 3.1 vs NVDEC 4th Gen.

FeatureRadeon 680MT400 4GB
Encoder
VCN 3.1
NVENC 7th Gen
Decoder
VCN 3.1
NVDEC 4th Gen
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 680M draws 50W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 50% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 680M) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 156mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureRadeon 680MT400 4GB
TDP
50W
30W-40%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
156mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Perf/Watt
76.7
126.8+65%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 680M (2023 vs 2021).

FeatureRadeon 680MT400 4GB
MSRP
$159
Codename
Rembrandt+
TU117
Release
January 3 2023
May 6 2021
Ranking
#512
#518

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.