
Radeon 680M

T400 4GB
Radeon 680M vs T400 4GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon 680M vs T400 4GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Radeon 680M vs T400 4GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon 680M
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 156mm, a 155mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 23.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
T400 4GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Older hardware, 2 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌15500% longer card at 156mm vs 1mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 680M vs T400 4GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 680M
The Radeon 680M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,836 points.
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 680M scores 3,836 and the T400 4GB reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 680M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon 680M) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 3.379 TFLOPS (Radeon 680M) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 2200 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,836 | 3,803 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 768+100% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.379 TFLOPS+209% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2200 MHz+54% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 48+100% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 680M | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 680M and 64-bit on the T400 4GB. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 680M) vs 1 MB (T400 4GB) — the Radeon 680M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Radeon 680M) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.1 (Radeon 680M) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: VCN 3.1 vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.1 | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 3.1 | NVDEC 4th Gen |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 680M draws 50W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 50% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 680M) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 156mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon 680M | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 30W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 156mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 76.7 | 126.8+65% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 680M (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon 680M | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $159 |
| Codename | Rembrandt+ | TU117 |
| Release | January 3 2023 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #512 | #518 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















