Radeon RX 7600 vs T400 4GB
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
T400 4GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Per Dollar T400 4GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 336% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T400 4GB.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+336%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-336%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $99), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 72.7% better value per dollar than the T400 4GB.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7600 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+72.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) | ✅More affordable ($99) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and T400 4GB
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the T400 4GB's 3,803 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 336%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+336% | 3,803 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+433% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+1888% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+86% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+33% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The T400 4GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7600 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the T400 4GB has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 1 MB (T400 4GB) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+300% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 138.5% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 30W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 156mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5 | 126.8+26% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP and currently averages $250, while the T400 4GB launched at $159 and now averages $99. The T400 4GB costs 60.4% less ($151 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 38.4 (T400 4GB) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 72.7% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269 | $159-41% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $250 | $99-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 66.3+73% | 38.4 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | TU117 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #118 | #518 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7600 and T400 4GB
