GeForce RTX 3060 vs T400 4GB
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:
T400 4GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060
Performance Per Dollar T400 4GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 346.9% higher G3D Mark score and 500% more VRAM (12 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T400 4GB.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+346.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-346.9%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $289 (vs $99), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 53.1% better value per dollar than the T400 4GB.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+53.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($289) | ✅More affordable ($99) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and T400 4GB
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
T400 4GB
The T400 4GB is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the T400 4GB's 3,803 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 346.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the T400 4GB uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 384 (T400 4GB). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400 4GB). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+347% | 3,803 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+833% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+1065% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+25% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+367% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+821% | 0.38 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The T400 4GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2.0 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the T400 4GB has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1 MB (T400 4GB) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12_0 (T400 4GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs NVENC 7th Gen (T400 4GB). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 4th Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the T400 4GB's 30W — a 140% difference. The T400 4GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (T400 4GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 156mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 30W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 156mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0 | 126.8+27% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP and currently averages $289, while the T400 4GB launched at $159 and now averages $99. The T400 4GB costs 65.7% less ($190 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 58.8 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 38.4 (T400 4GB) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 53.1% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | T400 4GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $159-52% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $289 | $99-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.8+53% | 38.4 |
| Codename | GA106 | TU117 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #114 | #518 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3060 and T400 4GB
