
Radeon 8050S vs Radeon RX 5700 XT

Radeon 8050S
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 8050S
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 8050S is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The Radeon 8050S likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX 5700 XT lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 8050S is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 5700 XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 8050S | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.5 / 4nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ⚠️ Potential Buffer Bottleneck | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (272mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 5700 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $400 for the Radeon 8050S, it costs 25% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 32.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 8050S | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+32.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 8050S and Radeon RX 5700 XT

Radeon 8050S
The Radeon 8050S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,259 points.

Radeon RX 5700 XT
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1605 MHz to 1905 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,183 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 8050S scores 16,259 and the Radeon RX 5700 XT reaches 16,183 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 8050S is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon RX 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon 8050S) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Raw compute: 11.47 TFLOPS (Radeon 8050S) vs 9.754 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 2800 MHz vs 1905 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,259 | 16,183 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.47 TFLOPS+18% | 9.754 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz+47% | 1905 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 160+25% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 8050S comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700 XT has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 5700 XT offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (Max) (Radeon 8050S) vs 448 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700 XT) — a 75% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 XT. Bus width: System Shared vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon 8050S) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 5700 XT) — the Radeon 8050S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | none | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X (Shared) | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s (Max) | 448 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | System Shared | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 8050S) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8050S) vs VCE (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8050S) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 5700 XT).
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | VCE |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 8050S draws 55W versus the Radeon RX 5700 XT's 225W — a 121.4% difference. The Radeon 8050S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon 8050S) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 272mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-76% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 272mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 295.6+311% | 71.9 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 8050S launched at $400 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the Radeon RX 5700 XT launched at $449 and now averages $300. The Radeon RX 5700 XT costs 25% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 40.6 (Radeon 8050S) vs 53.9 (Radeon RX 5700 XT) — the Radeon RX 5700 XT offers 32.8% better value. The Radeon 8050S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon 8050S | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $400-11% | $449 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $300-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.6 | 53.9+33% |
| Codename | Strix Halo | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | July 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #126 | #128 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














