RADEON 9550 vs MOBILITY RADEON X300
RADEON 9550
Popular choices:
MOBILITY RADEON X300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9550 is positioned at rank 363 and the MOBILITY RADEON X300 is on rank 716, so the RADEON 9550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9550
Performance Per Dollar MOBILITY RADEON X300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9550 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2010). The RADEON 9550 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The MOBILITY RADEON X300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the MOBILITY RADEON X300.
| Insight | RADEON 9550 | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The MOBILITY RADEON X300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the MOBILITY RADEON X300 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $30), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 191.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON 9550 | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+191.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9550 and MOBILITY RADEON X300
RADEON 9550
The RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $79.
MOBILITY RADEON X300
The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON 9550 scores 35 and the MOBILITY RADEON X300 reaches 34 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON 9550 is built on GCN 4.0 while the MOBILITY RADEON X300 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (RADEON 9550) vs 800 (MOBILITY RADEON X300). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 9550) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (MOBILITY RADEON X300).
| Feature | RADEON 9550 | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 35+3% | 34 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 800+56% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS+8% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 40+25% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+60% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9550 | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9550 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the MOBILITY RADEON X300 has 128 MB. The RADEON 9550 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | RADEON 9550 | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9550 draws 50W versus the MOBILITY RADEON X300's 50W — a 0% difference. The MOBILITY RADEON X300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9550) vs 350W (MOBILITY RADEON X300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON 9550 | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9550 launched at $129 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the MOBILITY RADEON X300 launched at $50 and now averages $10. The MOBILITY RADEON X300 costs 66.7% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (RADEON 9550) vs 3.4 (MOBILITY RADEON X300) — the MOBILITY RADEON X300 offers 183.3% better value. The RADEON 9550 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2010).
| Feature | RADEON 9550 | MOBILITY RADEON X300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $129 | $50-61% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $10-67% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 3.4+183% |
| Codename | Lexa | Broadway |
| Release | April 20 2017 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #668 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON 9550 and MOBILITY RADEON X300
