CPU
GPU
RADEON 9800
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON 9800 is positioned at rank #740 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9800
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 20403.4% higher G3D Mark score and 6300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9800.
| Insight | RADEON 9800 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-20403.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+20403.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $399 for the RADEON 9800, it costs 62% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 54439.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON 9800 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+54439.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($399) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9800 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
RADEON 9800
The RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9800 scores 58 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 20403.4%. The RADEON 9800 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON 9800) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (RADEON 9800) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 80.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 58 | 11,892+20403% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.85 TFLOPS+65% | 8.986 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+65% | 1755 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+100% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40+100% | 20 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9800 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9800 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 6300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON 9800) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the RADEON 9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 8 GB+6300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+300% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9800 draws 55W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 81.1% difference. The RADEON 9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9800) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-58% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1 | 91.5+8218% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9800 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $399, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 62.4% less ($249 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (RADEON 9800) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 79200% better value. The RADEON 9800 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | RADEON 9800 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $249-38% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $399 | $150-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 79.3+79200% |
| Codename | Strix Halo | GA106 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #98 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON 9800 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
