
Radeon E6760
Popular choices:

GRID M60-0Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon E6760 is positioned at rank #275 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon E6760
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon E6760 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M60-0Q.
| Insight | Radeon E6760 | GRID M60-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon E6760 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon E6760 holds the technical lead. Priced at $79 (vs $500), it costs 84% less, resulting in a 550.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon E6760 | GRID M60-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+550.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($79) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon E6760 and GRID M60-0Q

Radeon E6760
The Radeon E6760 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 850 points. Launch price was $239.99.

GRID M60-0Q
The GRID M60-0Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 827 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon E6760 scores 850 and the GRID M60-0Q reaches 827 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E6760 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GRID M60-0Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon E6760) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-0Q).
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | GRID M60-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 850+3% | 827 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 2048+327% |
| ROPs | 8 | 64+700% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | GRID M60-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | GRID M60-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon E6760 draws 45W versus the GRID M60-0Q's 225W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon E6760 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon E6760) vs 350W (GRID M60-0Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | GRID M60-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-80% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 18.9+411% | 3.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon E6760 launched at $240 MSRP and currently averages $79, while the GRID M60-0Q launched at $0 and now averages $500. The Radeon E6760 costs 84.2% less ($421 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.8 (Radeon E6760) vs 1.7 (GRID M60-0Q) — the Radeon E6760 offers 535.3% better value. The GRID M60-0Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon E6760 | GRID M60-0Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $240 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $79-84% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.8+535% | 1.7 |
| Codename | Turks | GM204 |
| Release | May 2 2011 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #923 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











