Radeon E6760 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

AMD

Radeon E6760

2011Core: 600 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

2023Core: 1855 MHzBoost: 2495 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon E6760 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon E6760 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon E6760 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon E6760

2011

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 295W, a 250W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 101.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $240 MSRPvs$119 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.5 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($240 MSRP vs $119 MSRP).

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

2023

Why buy it

  • 62.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $121 less on MSRP ($119 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
  • Delivers 98.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.0 vs 3.5 G3D/$ ($119 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 555.6% higher power demand at 295W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 62.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon E6760 instead at 850 vs 837, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 40nm, 96 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2011. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $121 cheaper on MSRP at $119 vs $240, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 98.6% (7.0 vs 3.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon E6760 vs Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon E6760

The Radeon E6760 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 850 points. Launch price was $239.99.

AMD

Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600

The Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 837 points. Launch price was $3,999.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon E6760 scores 850 and the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 reaches 837 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon E6760 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 480 (Radeon E6760) vs 6,144 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600).

FeatureRadeon E6760Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
G3D Mark Score
850+2%
837
Architecture
TeraScale 2
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
480
6144+1180%
ROPs
8
192+2300%
TMUs
24
384+1500%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling + RSR

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon E6760Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon E6760 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600.

FeatureRadeon E6760Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon E6760 draws 45W versus the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600's 295W — a 147.1% difference. The Radeon E6760 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon E6760) vs 350W (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon E6760Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
TDP
45W-85%
295W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
18.9+575%
2.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon E6760 came in at $240, while the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 launched at $119. On MSRP, Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 was 50.4% cheaper ($121 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.5 (Radeon E6760) vs 7.0 (Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600) — the Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600 (2023 vs 2011).

FeatureRadeon E6760Radeon R7 PRO A8-9600
MSRP
$240
$119-50%
Performance per Dollar
3.5
7.0+100%
Codename
Turks
Navi 31
Release
May 2 2011
April 13 2023
Ranking
#923
#26

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.