CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 3200
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon 4100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 3200 is positioned at rank 321 and the Mobility Radeon 4100 is on rank 666, so the Radeon HD 3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3200
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon 4100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 3200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon 4100.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3200 | Mobility Radeon 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 3200 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 3200 holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $49), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 396% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3200 | Mobility Radeon 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+396%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($10) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 3200 and Mobility Radeon 4100
Radeon HD 3200
The Radeon HD 3200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 82 points. Launch price was $180.
Mobility Radeon 4100
The Mobility Radeon 4100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 81 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 3200 scores 82 and the Mobility Radeon 4100 reaches 81 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3200 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Mobility Radeon 4100 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 3200) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon 4100). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3200) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon 4100).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | Mobility Radeon 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 82+1% | 81 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+60% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.92 TFLOPS+118% | 0.88 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+100% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | Mobility Radeon 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 3200) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon 4100) — the Radeon HD 3200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | Mobility Radeon 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (Radeon HD 3200) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon 4100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | Mobility Radeon 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (Radeon HD 3200) vs None (Mobility Radeon 4100). Decoder: UVD vs UVD 2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | Mobility Radeon 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | None |
| Decoder | UVD | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | — | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3200 draws 186W versus the Mobility Radeon 4100's 30W — a 144.4% difference. The Mobility Radeon 4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3200) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon 4100). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | Mobility Radeon 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 186W | 30W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 2.7+575% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 3200 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Mobility Radeon 4100 launched at $49 and now averages $49. The Radeon HD 3200 costs 79.6% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.2 (Radeon HD 3200) vs 1.7 (Mobility Radeon 4100) — the Radeon HD 3200 offers 382.4% better value. The Radeon HD 3200 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3200 | Mobility Radeon 4100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $49-2% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10-80% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.2+382% | 1.7 |
| Codename | Cayman | M98 |
| Release | December 1 2011 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #598 | #927 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 3200 and Mobility Radeon 4100
