
Radeon HD 3450 vs Radeon HD 7310G

Radeon HD 3450
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7310G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 3450 is positioned at rank 273 and the Radeon HD 7310G is on rank 269, so the Radeon HD 7310G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 3450
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7310G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7310G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 3450.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3450 | Radeon HD 7310G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7310G offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7310G holds the technical lead. Priced at $10 (vs $15), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 51.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 3450 | Radeon HD 7310G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+51.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($15) | ✅More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 3450 and Radeon HD 7310G

Radeon HD 3450
The Radeon HD 3450 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 25 2008. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 110W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 179 points. Launch price was $199.

Radeon HD 7310G
The Radeon HD 7310G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 47W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 181 points. Launch price was $59.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 3450 scores 179 and the Radeon HD 7310G reaches 181 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3450 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 7310G uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 3450) vs 384 (Radeon HD 7310G). Raw compute: 1 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3450) vs 0.6144 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7310G).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3450 | Radeon HD 7310G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 179 | 181+1% |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+108% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1 TFLOPS+63% | 0.6144 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 40+67% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB+67% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3450 | Radeon HD 7310G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3450 | Radeon HD 7310G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3450 draws 110W versus the Radeon HD 7310G's 47W — a 80.3% difference. The Radeon HD 7310G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3450) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7310G). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3450 | Radeon HD 7310G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 110W | 47W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.6 | 3.9+144% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 3450 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon HD 7310G launched at $50 and now averages $10. The Radeon HD 7310G costs 33.3% less ($5 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.9 (Radeon HD 3450) vs 18.1 (Radeon HD 7310G) — the Radeon HD 7310G offers 52.1% better value. The Radeon HD 7310G is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3450 | Radeon HD 7310G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $10-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.9 | 18.1+52% |
| Codename | RV770 | Cape Verde |
| Release | June 25 2008 | May 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #876 | #841 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















