Radeon HD 3850 vs Radeon HD 4670

AMD

Radeon HD 3850

2012Boost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 4670

2010Boost: 880 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 3850 vs Radeon HD 4670 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 3850 vs Radeon HD 4670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 3850 vs Radeon HD 4670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 3850

2012

Why buy it

  • Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 167.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $179 MSRPvs$67 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).

Radeon HD 4670

2010

Why buy it

  • 2.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $112 less on MSRP ($67 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
  • Delivers 154.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
  • Measures 193mm instead of 208mm, a 15mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 4670 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 3850 instead at 401 vs 382, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 3850 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $112 cheaper on MSRP at $67 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 154.5% (5.7 vs 2.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 4670 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 3850 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 3850 vs Radeon HD 4670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 3850

The Radeon HD 3850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 401 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Radeon HD 4670

The Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $369.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 3850 scores 401 versus the Radeon HD 4670's 382 — the Radeon HD 3850 leads by 5%. The Radeon HD 3850 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon HD 3850) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 4670). Raw compute: 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3850) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4670). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 880 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 3850Radeon HD 4670
G3D Mark Score
401+5%
382
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
1024
1536+50%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.761 TFLOPS
2.703 TFLOPS+53%
Boost Clock
1000 MHz+14%
880 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
96+50%
L1 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 3850Radeon HD 4670
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3850 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4670.

FeatureRadeon HD 3850Radeon HD 4670
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 3850) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4670). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureRadeon HD 3850Radeon HD 4670
DirectX
10.1
10.1
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: UVD+ vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,DivX,MPEG-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 3850) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 4670).

FeatureRadeon HD 3850Radeon HD 4670
Decoder
UVD+
UVD 2.2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,DivX,MPEG-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 3850 draws 130W versus the Radeon HD 4670's 250W — a 63.2% difference. The Radeon HD 3850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 3850) vs 300W (Radeon HD 4670). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 208mm vs 193mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.

FeatureRadeon HD 3850Radeon HD 4670
TDP
130W-48%
250W
Recommended PSU
450W
300W-33%
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
None
Length
208mm
193mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
65°C-19%
Perf/Watt
3.1+107%
1.5
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 3850 came in at $179, while the Radeon HD 4670 launched at $67. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4670 was 62.6% cheaper ($112 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (Radeon HD 3850) vs 5.7 (Radeon HD 4670) — the Radeon HD 4670 offers 159.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 3850 (2012 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon HD 3850Radeon HD 4670
MSRP
$179
$67-63%
Performance per Dollar
2.2
5.7+159%
Codename
Pitcairn
Cayman
Release
March 5 2012
December 14 2010
Ranking
#503
#596

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.