
Radeon HD 3850

Radeon HD 4670
Radeon HD 3850 vs Radeon HD 4670 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 3850 vs Radeon HD 4670 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 3850 vs Radeon HD 4670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 3850
2012Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 250W, a 120W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4670 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌167.2% HIGHER MSRP$179 MSRPvs$67 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
Radeon HD 4670
2010Why buy it
- ✅2.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $112 less on MSRP ($67 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 154.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($67 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Measures 193mm instead of 208mm, a 15mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 130W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 3850 vs Radeon HD 4670 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 3850
The Radeon HD 3850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 401 points. Launch price was $249.

Radeon HD 4670
The Radeon HD 4670 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 382 points. Launch price was $369.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 3850 scores 401 versus the Radeon HD 4670's 382 — the Radeon HD 3850 leads by 5%. The Radeon HD 3850 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 4670 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon HD 3850) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 4670). Raw compute: 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3850) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4670). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 880 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 401+5% | 382 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1536+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.761 TFLOPS | 2.703 TFLOPS+53% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz+14% | 880 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 96+50% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+33% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3850 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 4670.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 3850) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4670). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 3+50% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD+ vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,DivX,MPEG-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 3850) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 4670).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| Decoder | UVD+ | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,DivX,MPEG-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 3850 draws 130W versus the Radeon HD 4670's 250W — a 63.2% difference. The Radeon HD 3850 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 3850) vs 300W (Radeon HD 4670). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs None. Card length: 208mm vs 193mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-48% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 300W-33% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Length | 208mm | 193mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 3.1+107% | 1.5 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 3850 came in at $179, while the Radeon HD 4670 launched at $67. On MSRP, Radeon HD 4670 was 62.6% cheaper ($112 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (Radeon HD 3850) vs 5.7 (Radeon HD 4670) — the Radeon HD 4670 offers 159.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 3850 (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | Radeon HD 3850 | Radeon HD 4670 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179 | $67-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.2 | 5.7+159% |
| Codename | Pitcairn | Cayman |
| Release | March 5 2012 | December 14 2010 |
| Ranking | #503 | #596 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














