
GeForce GT 330

Radeon HD 3850
GeForce GT 330 vs Radeon HD 3850 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 330 vs Radeon HD 3850 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 330 vs Radeon HD 3850: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 330
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $80 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 77.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.0 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 130W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 175mm instead of 208mm, a 33mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3850 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon HD 3850
2012Why buy it
- ✅15.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌80.8% HIGHER MSRP$179 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 4.0 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 30W.
- ❌18.9% longer card at 208mm vs 175mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 330 vs Radeon HD 3850 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 330
The GeForce GT 330 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 393 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon HD 3850
The Radeon HD 3850 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 401 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 330 scores 393 and the Radeon HD 3850 reaches 401 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 330 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 3850 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 330) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 3850). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 330) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3850). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 393 | 401+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 1.761 TFLOPS+56% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+47% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 64+167% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 256 KB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 330 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 3850 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 330 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 3850 carries 1 GB. Radeon HD 3850 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 330 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3850.
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (10_1) (GeForce GT 330) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 3850). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1)+10% | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: PureVideo HD vs UVD+. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GT 330) vs H.264,VC-1,DivX,MPEG-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 3850).
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | PureVideo HD | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD | UVD+ |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,VC-1,DivX,MPEG-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 330 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 3850's 130W — a 125% difference. The GeForce GT 330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 330) vs 450W (Radeon HD 3850). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 175mm vs 208mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-77% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 175mm | 208mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.1+323% | 3.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 330 came in at $99, while the Radeon HD 3850 launched at $179. On MSRP, GeForce GT 330 was 44.7% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.0 (GeForce GT 330) vs 2.2 (Radeon HD 3850) — the GeForce GT 330 offers 81.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 330 (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | Radeon HD 3850 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-45% | $179 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.0+82% | 2.2 |
| Codename | GP108 | Pitcairn |
| Release | May 17 2017 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #641 | #503 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














