GeForce GT 330 vs Radeon HD 6550D

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 330 vs Radeon HD 6550D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 330 vs Radeon HD 6550D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 330

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6550D across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
41.4% HIGHER MSRP
$99 MSRPvs$70 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.0 vs 5.7 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $70 MSRP).

Radeon HD 6550D

2010

Why buy it

✅18.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($70 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
✅Delivers 43.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.7 vs 4.0 G3D/$ ($70 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6550D is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 18.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (400 vs 393), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 330 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6550D makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 cheaper on MSRP at $70 vs $99, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 43.9% (5.7 vs 4.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6550D is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 330 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 330 vs Radeon HD 6550D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 330

The GeForce GT 330 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 393 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon HD 6550D

The Radeon HD 6550D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 400 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 330 scores 393 and the Radeon HD 6550D reaches 400 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 330 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 6550D uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 330) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6550D). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 330) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6550D). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 800 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GT 330	Radeon HD 6550D
G3D Mark Score	393	400+2%
Architecture	Pascal	TeraScale 3
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	1408+267%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.127 TFLOPS	2.253 TFLOPS+100%
Boost Clock	1468 MHz+84%	800 MHz
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	24	88+267%
L1 Cache	144 KB	352 KB+144%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 330 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 6550D leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 330	Radeon HD 6550D
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 330 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6550D.

Feature	GeForce GT 330	Radeon HD 6550D
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 330 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 6550D's 200W — a 147.8% difference. The GeForce GT 330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 330) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6550D). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	GeForce GT 330	Radeon HD 6550D
TDP	30W-85%	200W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	1x 6-pin
Length	175mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	13.1+555%	2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 330 came in at $99, while the Radeon HD 6550D launched at $70. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6550D was 29.3% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 4.0 (GeForce GT 330) vs 5.7 (Radeon HD 6550D) — the Radeon HD 6550D offers 42.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 330 (2017 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce GT 330	Radeon HD 6550D
MSRP	$99	$70-29%
Performance per Dollar	4.0	5.7+43%
Codename	GP108	Cayman
Release	May 17 2017	December 14 2010
Ranking	#641	#623

Search GeForce GT 330 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6550D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.