CPU
GPU
GeForce GT 330
Popular choices:
RADEON E4690
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 330 is positioned at rank 260 and the RADEON E4690 is on rank 713, so the GeForce GT 330 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 330
Performance Per Dollar RADEON E4690
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON E4690 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 330.
| Insight | GeForce GT 330 | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 330 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 330 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $558), it costs 95% less, resulting in a 1704.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 330 | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1704.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($558) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 330 and RADEON E4690
GeForce GT 330
The GeForce GT 330 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 393 points. Launch price was $79.
RADEON E4690
The RADEON E4690 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 405 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 330 scores 393 and the RADEON E4690 reaches 405 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 330 is built on Pascal while the RADEON E4690 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 330) vs 2,048 (RADEON E4690). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 330) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON E4690). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 393 | 405+3% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+263% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+47% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 512 KB+256% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 330 draws 30W versus the RADEON E4690's 95W — a 104% difference. The GeForce GT 330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 330) vs 350W (RADEON E4690). Power connectors: None vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-68% | 95W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Legacy |
| Length | 175mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.1+205% | 4.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 330 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $30, while the RADEON E4690 launched at $558 and now averages $558. The GeForce GT 330 costs 94.6% less ($528 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.1 (GeForce GT 330) vs 0.7 (RADEON E4690) — the GeForce GT 330 offers 1771.4% better value. The GeForce GT 330 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-82% | $558 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-95% | $558 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.1+1771% | 0.7 |
| Codename | GP108 | Amethyst |
| Release | May 17 2017 | September 29 2015 |
| Ranking | #641 | #420 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 330 and RADEON E4690
