
GeForce GT 330
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7470M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 330 is positioned at rank 260 and the Radeon HD 7470M is on rank 106, so the Radeon HD 7470M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 330
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7470M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7470M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 330.
| Insight | GeForce GT 330 | Radeon HD 7470M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7470M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7470M holds the technical lead. Priced at $12 (vs $30), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 159.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 330 | Radeon HD 7470M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+159.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($30) | ✅More affordable ($12) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 330 and Radeon HD 7470M

GeForce GT 330
The GeForce GT 330 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 393 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon HD 7470M
The Radeon HD 7470M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 408 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 330 scores 393 and the Radeon HD 7470M reaches 408 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 330 is built on Pascal while the Radeon HD 7470M uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 330) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 7470M). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 330) vs 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7470M).
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | Radeon HD 7470M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 393 | 408+4% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1280+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 2.176 TFLOPS+93% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 80+233% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 320 KB+122% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | Radeon HD 7470M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 330 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7470M has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 7470M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | Radeon HD 7470M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 330 draws 30W versus the Radeon HD 7470M's 100W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GT 330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 330) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7470M). Power connectors: None vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | Radeon HD 7470M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-70% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 175mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 13.1+220% | 4.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7470M costs 60% less ($18 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.1 (GeForce GT 330) vs 34.0 (Radeon HD 7470M) — the Radeon HD 7470M offers 159.5% better value. The GeForce GT 330 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 330 | Radeon HD 7470M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30 | $12-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.1 | 34.0+160% |
| Codename | GP108 | Wimbledon |
| Release | May 17 2017 | April 24 2012 |
| Ranking | #641 | #531 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















