Radeon HD 4200 vs Radeon HD 6290

AMD

Radeon HD 4200

2009Core: 850 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6290

2011Core: 830 MHz

Radeon HD 4200 vs Radeon HD 6290 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 4200 vs Radeon HD 6290 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 4200 vs Radeon HD 6290: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 4200

2009

Why buy it

  • 43.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 190W instead of 375W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6290

2011

Why buy it

  • More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 97.4% higher power demand at 375W vs 190W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 4200 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 43.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 6.7% in PassMark G3D (112 vs 105), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 4200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 4200 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $50 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 6.7% (2.2 vs 2.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon HD 4200 vs Radeon HD 6290 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 4200

The Radeon HD 4200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 112 points. Launch price was $249.

AMD

Radeon HD 6290

The Radeon HD 6290 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 8 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 830 MHz. It has 1536 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 375W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 105 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 4200 scores 112 versus the Radeon HD 6290's 105 — the Radeon HD 4200 leads by 6.7%. The Radeon HD 4200 is built on TeraScale while the Radeon HD 6290 uses TeraScale 3, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 4200) vs 1,536 (Radeon HD 6290). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4200) vs 2.55 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 6290).

FeatureRadeon HD 4200Radeon HD 6290
G3D Mark Score
112+7%
105
Architecture
TeraScale
TeraScale 3
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
800
1536 ×2+92%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.36 TFLOPS
2.55 TFLOPS ×2+87%
ROPs
16
32 ×2+100%
TMUs
40
96 ×2+140%
L1 Cache
160 KB
384 KB+140%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 4200Radeon HD 6290
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4200 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6290. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 4200) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6290) — the Radeon HD 6290 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 4200Radeon HD 6290
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (Radeon HD 4200) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 6290). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureRadeon HD 4200Radeon HD 6290
DirectX
10.1
11.2+11%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Decoder: UVD 2 vs UVD 3.

FeatureRadeon HD 4200Radeon HD 6290
Encoder
UVD 2
Decoder
UVD 2
UVD 3
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4200 draws 190W versus the Radeon HD 6290's 375W — a 65.5% difference. The Radeon HD 4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4200) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6290). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon HD 4200Radeon HD 6290
TDP
190W-49%
375W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Length
1mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
65°C
Perf/Watt
0.6+100%
0.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 4200 came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 6290 launched at $50. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.2 (Radeon HD 4200) vs 2.1 (Radeon HD 6290) — the Radeon HD 4200 offers 4.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 6290 (2011 vs 2009).

FeatureRadeon HD 4200Radeon HD 6290
MSRP
$50
$50
Performance per Dollar
2.2+5%
2.1
Codename
RV790
Antilles
Release
April 2 2009
March 8 2011
Ranking
#762
#583

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.