
GeForce Go 6800

Radeon HD 4200
GeForce Go 6800 vs Radeon HD 4200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce Go 6800 vs Radeon HD 4200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce Go 6800 vs Radeon HD 4200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce Go 6800
2012Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 4200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2012 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
Radeon HD 4200
2009Why buy it
- ✅43.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 6800 vs Radeon HD 4200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 6800
The GeForce Go 6800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon HD 4200
The Radeon HD 4200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 2 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 112 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6800 scores 106 versus the Radeon HD 4200's 112 — the Radeon HD 4200 leads by 5.7%. The GeForce Go 6800 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 4200 uses TeraScale, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce Go 6800) vs 800 (Radeon HD 4200). Raw compute: 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6800) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4200).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6800 | Radeon HD 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 106 | 112+6% |
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+92% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.25 TFLOPS+139% | 1.36 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 160 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce Go 6800 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 4200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6800 | Radeon HD 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce Go 6800 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 4200 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 4200 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6800 and 64-bit on the Radeon HD 4200. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce Go 6800) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 4200) — the GeForce Go 6800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6800 | Radeon HD 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce Go 6800) vs 10.1 (Radeon HD 4200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6800 | Radeon HD 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.0 | 10.1 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 6800) vs UVD 2 (Radeon HD 4200). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs UVD 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6800 | Radeon HD 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | UVD 2 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP2 | UVD 2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 6800 draws 195W versus the Radeon HD 4200's 190W — a 2.6% difference. The Radeon HD 4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6800) vs 350W (Radeon HD 4200). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce Go 6800 | Radeon HD 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 195W | 190W-3% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 0.6+20% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce Go 6800 (2012 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce Go 6800 | Radeon HD 4200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $50 |
| Codename | GK104 | RV790 |
| Release | March 22 2012 | April 2 2009 |
| Ranking | #410 | #762 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














