GeForce Go 6800 vs Quadro FX 560

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6800

2012Core: 1006 MHzBoost: 1058 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 560

2008Core: 610 MHz

GeForce Go 6800 vs Quadro FX 560 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 6800 vs Quadro FX 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 6800 vs Quadro FX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 6800

2012

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 560 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2012 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Quadro FX 560

2008

Why buy it

  • 50.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 560 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 50.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 7.5% in PassMark G3D (114 vs 106), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce Go 6800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2012 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 560 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 560 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce Go 6800 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 6800 vs Quadro FX 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 6800

The GeForce Go 6800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 106 points. Launch price was $499.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 560

The Quadro FX 560 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 114 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6800 scores 106 versus the Quadro FX 560's 114 — the Quadro FX 560 leads by 7.5%. The GeForce Go 6800 is built on Kepler while the Quadro FX 560 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce Go 6800) vs 240 (Quadro FX 560). Raw compute: 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6800) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 560).

FeatureGeForce Go 6800Quadro FX 560
G3D Mark Score
106
114+8%
Architecture
Kepler
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
1536+540%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.25 TFLOPS+422%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+60%
80
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 6800 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 560 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce Go 6800Quadro FX 560
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 128 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6800 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 560. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce Go 6800) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 560) — the GeForce Go 6800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 6800Quadro FX 560
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce Go 6800) vs 9_0c (Quadro FX 560). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce Go 6800Quadro FX 560
DirectX
10.0+11%
9_0c
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 6800 draws 195W versus the Quadro FX 560's 189W — a 3.1% difference. The Quadro FX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6800) vs 350W (Quadro FX 560). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce Go 6800Quadro FX 560
TDP
195W
189W-3%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
1mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
75°C
Perf/Watt
0.5
0.6+20%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce Go 6800 (2012 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce Go 6800Quadro FX 560
MSRP
$299
Codename
GK104
GT200B
Release
March 22 2012
November 11 2008
Ranking
#410
#815

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.