Radeon HD 4650
VS
Quadro FX 570

Radeon HD 4650 vs Quadro FX 570

AMD

Radeon HD 4650

2010Boost: 800 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX 570

2008Core: 610 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 4650 is positioned at rank 275 and the Quadro FX 570 is on rank 330, so the Radeon HD 4650 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 4650

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
2049%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1969%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1946%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1942%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1938%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1927%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1903%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1896%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1879%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1873%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1851%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1847%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1814%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1812%
#259
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
2260%
#274
Radeon E6760
MSRP: $240|Avg: $79
100%
#275
Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
100%
#277
Radeon Ryzen 7 3700U
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
98%
#278
Radeon R4
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#280
Radeon R7 A10-8750
MSRP: $250|Avg: $30
97%
#281
Radeon HD 6410D
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
96%
#283
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
MSRP: $130|Avg: $130
94%
#284
Radeon R9 M280X
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
92%
#285
Radeon HD 5470
MSRP: $83|Avg: $83
91%
#286
GeForce GT 220
MSRP: $69|Avg: $49
91%
#287
Radeon R7 A10-8850
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
87%
#289
GeForce G210
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
84%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 570

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
81%
#315
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
11364%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
100%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
99%
#333
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
98%
#334
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
98%
#335
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
98%
#336
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
97%
#337
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
96%
#338
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
95%
#339
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
95%
#340
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
90%
#341
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
88%
#342
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
83%
#343
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
82%
#344
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
82%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 4650 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon HD 4650Quadro FX 570
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-4%)
Leading raw performance (+4%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro FX 570 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro FX 570 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 4650Quadro FX 570
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+4%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 4650 and Quadro FX 570

AMD

Radeon HD 4650

The Radeon HD 4650 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 248 points. Launch price was $299.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 570

The Quadro FX 570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 258 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 4650 scores 248 and the Quadro FX 570 reaches 258 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 4650 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Quadro FX 570 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon HD 4650) vs 240 (Quadro FX 570). Raw compute: 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 4650) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 570).

FeatureRadeon HD 4650Quadro FX 570
G3D Mark Score
248
258+4%
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
1408+487%
240
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.253 TFLOPS+262%
0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
88+10%
80
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 4650Quadro FX 570
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 4650 comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 570 has 256 MB. The Radeon HD 4650 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 4650) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 570) — the Radeon HD 4650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 4650Quadro FX 570
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+300%
0.25 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 4650 draws 200W versus the Quadro FX 570's 189W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 4650) vs 350W (Quadro FX 570). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 4650Quadro FX 570
TDP
200W
189W-6%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
1.2
1.4+17%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 4650 launched at $70 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Quadro FX 570 launched at $199 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.5 (Radeon HD 4650) vs 17.2 (Quadro FX 570) — the Quadro FX 570 offers 4.2% better value. The Radeon HD 4650 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon HD 4650Quadro FX 570
MSRP
$70-65%
$199
Avg Price (30d)
$15
$15
Performance per Dollar
16.5
17.2+4%
Codename
Cayman
GT200B
Release
December 14 2010
November 11 2008
Ranking
#623
#815