Radeon HD 5470 vs Radeon HD 8280

AMD

Radeon HD 5470

2009Core: 725 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 8280

2013Core: 725 MHzBoost: 775 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon HD 5470 vs Radeon HD 8280 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 5470 vs Radeon HD 8280 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 5470 vs Radeon HD 8280: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 5470

2009

Why buy it

  • 21.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2009 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 66% HIGHER MSRP
    $83 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 5.2 G3D/$ ($83 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 488% higher power demand at 294W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 8280

2013

Why buy it

  • Costs $33 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $83 MSRP).
  • Delivers 61.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.2 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $83 MSRP).
  • Draws 50W instead of 294W, a 244W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 5470 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 5470 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 21.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.7% in PassMark G3D (268 vs 261), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 5470 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 8280 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $33 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $83, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 61.7% (5.2 vs 3.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8280 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 5470 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 5470 vs Radeon HD 8280 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon HD 5470

The Radeon HD 5470 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 268 points. Launch price was $699.

AMD

Radeon HD 8280

The Radeon HD 8280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 261 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 5470 scores 268 and the Radeon HD 8280 reaches 261 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5470 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon HD 8280 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (Radeon HD 5470) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8280). Raw compute: 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 5470) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8280).

FeatureRadeon HD 5470Radeon HD 8280
G3D Mark Score
268+3%
261
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1600 ×2+150%
640
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.32 TFLOPS ×2+134%
0.992 TFLOPS
ROPs
32 ×2+100%
16
TMUs
80 ×2+100%
40
L1 Cache
320 KB+100%
160 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 5470Radeon HD 8280
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5470 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8280. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 5470) vs 256 KB (Radeon HD 8280) — the Radeon HD 5470 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 5470Radeon HD 8280
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+100%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 5470 draws 294W versus the Radeon HD 8280's 50W — a 141.9% difference. The Radeon HD 8280 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 5470) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8280). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon HD 5470Radeon HD 8280
TDP
294W
50W-83%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
0.9
5.2+478%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 5470 came in at $83, while the Radeon HD 8280 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8280 was 39.8% cheaper ($33 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (Radeon HD 5470) vs 5.2 (Radeon HD 8280) — the Radeon HD 8280 offers 62.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8280 (2013 vs 2009).

FeatureRadeon HD 5470Radeon HD 8280
MSRP
$83
$50-40%
Performance per Dollar
3.2
5.2+63%
Codename
Hemlock
Venus
Release
November 18 2009
April 1 2013
Ranking
#651
#745

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.