Radeon HD 5570 vs Radeon R5 M240 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon HD 5570 vs Radeon R5 M240 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon HD 5570 vs Radeon R5 M240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon HD 5570
2009Why buy it
- β 73.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- β Costs $20 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- β Delivers 25.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.0 vs 4.7 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- β 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- β2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β880% higher power demand at 294W vs 30W.
- β16700% longer card at 168mm vs 1mm.
Radeon R5 M240
2013Why buy it
- β Draws 30W instead of 294W, a 264W reduction.
- β Measures 1mm instead of 168mm, a 167mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- β More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012β2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower average FPS than Radeon HD 5570 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- β2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- β25% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.7 vs 6.0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 5570 vs Radeon R5 M240 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 5570
The Radeon HD 5570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 Γ2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 476 points. Launch price was $699.

Radeon R5 M240
The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 5570 scores 476 and the Radeon R5 M240 reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5570 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon R5 M240 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,600 (Radeon HD 5570) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M240). Raw compute: 2.32 TFLOPS Γ2 (Radeon HD 5570) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M240).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5570 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 476 | 473 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1600 Γ2+400% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.32 TFLOPS Γ2+418% | 0.448 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 Γ2+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80 Γ2+300% | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+300% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 5570 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 5570 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M240 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 5570 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5570 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M240. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 5570) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5 M240) β the Radeon HD 5570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5570 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 5570) vs 12 (Radeon R5 M240). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5570 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12+7% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Radeon HD 5570) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M240). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5570 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | β |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 5570 draws 294W versus the Radeon R5 M240's 30W β a 163% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 250W (Radeon HD 5570) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M240). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 168mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5570 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 294W | 30W-90% |
| Recommended PSU | 250W-29% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 168mm | 1mm |
| Height | 69mm | β |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 1.6 | 15.8+888% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon HD 5570 came in at $80, while the Radeon R5 M240 launched at $100. On MSRP, Radeon HD 5570 was 20% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.0 (Radeon HD 5570) vs 4.7 (Radeon R5 M240) β the Radeon HD 5570 offers 27.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M240 (2013 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5570 | Radeon R5 M240 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-20% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0+28% | 4.7 |
| Codename | Hemlock | Oland |
| Release | November 18 2009 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #651 | #911 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















