
GeForce 820M

Radeon HD 5570
GeForce 820M vs Radeon HD 5570 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 820M vs Radeon HD 5570 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Warzone

Civilization VI
GeForce 820M vs Radeon HD 5570: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 820M
2014Why buy it
- ✅231.3% more average FPS across 18 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 294W, a 261W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
Radeon HD 5570
2009Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 820M across 18 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2009 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌790.9% higher power demand at 294W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 820M vs Radeon HD 5570 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 820M
The GeForce 820M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 482 points.

Radeon HD 5570
The Radeon HD 5570 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 18 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1600 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 294W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 476 points. Launch price was $699.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 820M scores 482 and the Radeon HD 5570 reaches 476 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 820M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 5570 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 820M) vs 1,600 (Radeon HD 5570). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 820M) vs 2.32 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon HD 5570).
| Feature | GeForce 820M | Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 482+1% | 476 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1600 ×2+317% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS | 2.32 TFLOPS ×2+169% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 ×2+300% |
| TMUs | 16 | 80 ×2+400% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 320 KB+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 820M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 5570 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 820M | Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 820M and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 5570. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 820M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 5570) — the GeForce 820M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 820M | Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 820M) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 5570). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce 820M | Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 11.2 (11_0)+2% |
| Vulkan | None | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.4+10% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 820M) vs None (Radeon HD 5570). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 2.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce 820M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 5570).
| Feature | GeForce 820M | Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | None |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 2.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 820M draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 5570's 294W — a 159.6% difference. The GeForce 820M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 820M) vs 250W (Radeon HD 5570). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce 820M | Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-89% | 294W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 250W-29% |
| Power Connector | Legacy | None |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 14.6+813% | 1.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce 820M (2014 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce 820M | Radeon HD 5570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $80 |
| Codename | GM108 | Hemlock |
| Release | March 12 2014 | November 18 2009 |
| Ranking | #854 | #651 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














