GeForce 820M
VS
Radeon R5 M315

GeForce 820M vs Radeon R5 M315

NVIDIA

GeForce 820M

2014Core: 1029 MHzBoost: 1124 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 M315

2016Core: 780 MHzBoost: 1030 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 820M is positioned at rank 341 and the Radeon R5 M315 is on rank 571, so the GeForce 820M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 820M

#331
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
901%
#333
817%
#334
815%
#338
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
741%
#339
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
736%
#341
GeForce 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#342
Radeon R7 M465X
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
99%
#344
GeForce 830A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
97%
#348
GeForce MX350
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
94%
#349
GeForce 840A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
93%
#350
HD Graphics 630
MSRP: $100|Avg: $30
92%
#351
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
92%
#354
Radeon R7 M370
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M315

#561
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
3330%
#563
3019%
#564
3011%
#568
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
2738%
#569
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
2719%
#571
Radeon R5 M315
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#572
Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3
MSRP: $599|Avg: $300
100%
#573
GeForce 9400 GT
MSRP: $59|Avg: $20
99%
#574
98%
#575
GeForce 240M GT
MSRP: $100|Avg: $5
98%
#576
98%
#577
GeForce 310
MSRP: $45|Avg: $5
98%
#578
97%
#579
GeForce 9600 GT
MSRP: $149|Avg: $20
97%
#580
Radeon R5 M320
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#581
97%
#582
Radeon HD 8650G + 8600M Dual
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
94%
#583
Mobility Radeon HD 4570
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
94%
#584
Radeon Vega 10
MSRP: $499|Avg: $100
93%
#585
92%
#586
Radeon R7 M440
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R5 M315 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 820M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGeForce 820MRadeon R5 M315
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%)
Leading raw performance (+1.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce 820M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 820M holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $150), it costs 80% less, resulting in a 392.8% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGeForce 820MRadeon R5 M315
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+392.8%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 820M and Radeon R5 M315

NVIDIA

GeForce 820M

The GeForce 820M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 482 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 M315

The Radeon R5 M315 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 489 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 820M scores 482 and the Radeon R5 M315 reaches 489 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 820M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R5 M315 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 820M) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M315). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 820M) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M315). Boost clocks: 1124 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 820MRadeon R5 M315
G3D Mark Score
482
489+1%
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384+20%
320
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.8632 TFLOPS+31%
0.6592 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1124 MHz+9%
1030 MHz
ROPs
8
8
TMUs
16
20+25%
L1 Cache
192 KB+140%
80 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+669%
0.13 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 820MRadeon R5 M315
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 820M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M315 has 512 MB. The GeForce 820M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 820M) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R5 M315) — the GeForce 820M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 820MRadeon R5 M315
VRAM Capacity
2 GB+300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+669%
0.13 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 820M draws 33W versus the Radeon R5 M315's 75W — a 77.8% difference. The GeForce 820M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 820M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M315). Power connectors: Legacy vs Mobile.

FeatureGeForce 820MRadeon R5 M315
TDP
33W-56%
75W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Mobile
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
14.6+125%
6.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 820M costs 80% less ($120 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.1 (GeForce 820M) vs 3.3 (Radeon R5 M315) — the GeForce 820M offers 387.9% better value. The Radeon R5 M315 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce 820MRadeon R5 M315
MSRP
$150
Avg Price (30d)
$30-80%
$150
Performance per Dollar
16.1+388%
3.3
Codename
GM108
Jet
Release
March 12 2014
May 15 2016
Ranking
#854
#922