
GeForce 820M vs Radeon HD 7660G

GeForce 820M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7660G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce 820M is positioned at rank 341 and the Radeon HD 7660G is on rank 372, so the GeForce 820M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 820M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7660G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 820M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7660G.
| Insight | GeForce 820M | Radeon HD 7660G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 820M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce 820M holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 67% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce 820M | Radeon HD 7660G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+67%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($30) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 820M and Radeon HD 7660G

GeForce 820M
The GeForce 820M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 482 points.

Radeon HD 7660G
The Radeon HD 7660G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 5 2012. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 481 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 820M scores 482 and the Radeon HD 7660G reaches 481 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 820M is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 7660G uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 820M) vs 480 (Radeon HD 7660G). Raw compute: 0.8632 TFLOPS (GeForce 820M) vs 0.576 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7660G).
| Feature | GeForce 820M | Radeon HD 7660G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 482 | 481 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 480+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8632 TFLOPS+50% | 0.576 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 8 |
| TMUs | 16 | 24+50% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+300% | 48 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 820M | Radeon HD 7660G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce 820M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7660G has 512 MB. The GeForce 820M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 820M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 7660G) — the GeForce 820M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 820M | Radeon HD 7660G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 820M) vs 11 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7660G). OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 820M | Radeon HD 7660G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 11 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.4+10% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 820M) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7660G). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs UVD 3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce 820M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon HD 7660G).
| Feature | GeForce 820M | Radeon HD 7660G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 820M draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 7660G's 45W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce 820M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 820M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7660G). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 820M | Radeon HD 7660G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-27% | 45W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 14.6+36% | 10.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 820M costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 16.1 (GeForce 820M) vs 9.6 (Radeon HD 7660G) — the GeForce 820M offers 67.7% better value. The GeForce 820M is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 820M | Radeon HD 7660G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $30-40% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.1+68% | 9.6 |
| Codename | GM108 | Turks |
| Release | March 12 2014 | January 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #854 | #870 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











