GeForce 820M vs GeForce 9800 GTX+

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 820M vs GeForce 9800 GTX+ FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 820M vs GeForce 9800 GTX+: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 820M

2014

Why buy it

✅236.3% more average FPS across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).

GeForce 9800 GTX+

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 820M across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 820M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 236.3% in average FPS across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce 9800 GTX+ instead at 489 vs 482, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 820M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 65nm, and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 9800 GTX+ makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 9800 GTX+ is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 820M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 820M vs GeForce 9800 GTX+ Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 820M

The GeForce 820M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1029 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 482 points.

GeForce 9800 GTX+

The GeForce 9800 GTX+ is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 489 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 820M scores 482 and the GeForce 9800 GTX+ reaches 489 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 820M is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9800 GTX+ uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 820M) vs 224 (GeForce 9800 GTX+).

Feature	GeForce 820M	GeForce 9800 GTX+
G3D Mark Score	482	489+1%
Architecture	Maxwell	G9x
Process Node	28 nm	65 nm
Shading Units	384+71%	224

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 820M	GeForce 9800 GTX+
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 820M has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9800 GTX+ carries 1 GB. GeForce 820M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 820M and 64-bit on the GeForce 9800 GTX+.

Feature	GeForce 820M	GeForce 9800 GTX+
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce 820M) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9800 GTX+). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 820M	GeForce 9800 GTX+
DirectX	11.0+10%	10.0
Vulkan	None	None
OpenGL	4.0+21%	3.3
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 820M) vs No (GeForce 9800 GTX+). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce 820M) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 9800 GTX+).

Feature	GeForce 820M	GeForce 9800 GTX+
Encoder	No	No
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP4	PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP	MPEG-2,H.264

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 820M draws 33W versus the GeForce 9800 GTX+'s 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 820M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 820M) vs 350W (GeForce 9800 GTX+). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 70°C vs 100°C.

Feature	GeForce 820M	GeForce 9800 GTX+
TDP	33W-78%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	70°C-30%	100°C
Perf/Watt	14.6+342%	3.3

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce 820M (2014 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 820M	GeForce 9800 GTX+
MSRP	—	$229
Codename	GM108	NB9E-GTX
Release	March 12 2014	July 15 2008
Ranking	#854	#825

Search GeForce 820M on Amazon

Search GeForce 9800 GTX+ on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.