Radeon HD 5600/5700
VS
GRID K160Q

Radeon HD 5600/5700 vs GRID K160Q

AMD

Radeon HD 5600/5700

2010Boost: 880 MHz
VS

GRID K160Q

2013Core: 745 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 5600/5700 is positioned at rank 196 and the GRID K160Q is on rank 213, so the Radeon HD 5600/5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 5600/5700

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1168%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1122%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1109%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1107%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1105%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1099%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1085%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1081%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1071%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1068%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1055%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1053%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1034%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1033%
#96
Radeon Ryzen 3 5300U
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
100%
#181
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1288%
#196
Radeon HD 5600/5700
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
100%
#197
GeForce GT 240
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
100%
#199
GeForce GT 705
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
99%
#200
Radeon HD 7340
MSRP: $25|Avg: $5
99%
#201
Radeon HD 5570
MSRP: $80|Avg: $80
96%
#202
GeForce GT 320
MSRP: $79|Avg: $30
96%
#203
Radeon R5 A6-8500P
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
95%
#204
Radeon HD 7580D
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
94%
#205
Radeon HD 7470
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
93%
#206
Radeon R5 A240
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
#207
Radeon HD 6550D
MSRP: $70|Avg: $70
92%
#208
Radeon HD 4670
MSRP: $67|Avg: $67
92%
#209
Radeon R7 A360
MSRP: $109|Avg: $55
91%
#210
Radeon R5 235X
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
91%
#211
Radeon HD 7290
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID K160Q

#91
RTX PRO 6000
MSRP: $8565|Avg: $8565
100%
#92
RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
98%
#93
Quadro RTX A6000
MSRP: $4649|Avg: $3500
98%
#198
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
2943%
#213
GRID K160Q
MSRP: $125|Avg: $30
100%
#215
Quadro
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
100%
#216
FirePro W5000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
99%
#219
FirePro W7000 Adapter
MSRP: $899|Avg: $15
97%
#220
Quadro K420
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
96%
#223
FirePro W7000
MSRP: $899|Avg: $50
95%
#224
Radeon R7 PRO A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $100
95%
#226
FirePro D500
MSRP: $500|Avg: $150
90%
#227
FirePro 3D V4800
MSRP: $189|Avg: $20
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID K160Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 5600/5700.

InsightRadeon HD 5600/5700GRID K160Q
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GRID K160Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID K160Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $99), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 237% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon HD 5600/5700GRID K160Q
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+237%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($99)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5600/5700 and GRID K160Q

AMD

Radeon HD 5600/5700

The Radeon HD 5600/5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 615 points. Launch price was $369.

NVIDIA

GRID K160Q

The GRID K160Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 628 points. Launch price was $937.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 5600/5700 scores 615 and the GRID K160Q reaches 628 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5600/5700 is built on TeraScale 3 while the GRID K160Q uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Radeon HD 5600/5700) vs 1,536 (GRID K160Q). Raw compute: 2.703 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5600/5700) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K160Q).

FeatureRadeon HD 5600/5700GRID K160Q
G3D Mark Score
615
628+2%
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Kepler
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536
1536
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.703 TFLOPS+18%
2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
96
128+33%
L1 Cache
192 KB+50%
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 5600/5700GRID K160Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

FeatureRadeon HD 5600/5700GRID K160Q
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 5600/5700 draws 250W versus the GRID K160Q's 225W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID K160Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 5600/5700) vs 350W (GRID K160Q). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon HD 5600/5700GRID K160Q
TDP
250W
225W-10%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
2.5
2.8+12%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 5600/5700 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $99, while the GRID K160Q launched at $125 and now averages $30. The GRID K160Q costs 69.7% less ($69 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.2 (Radeon HD 5600/5700) vs 20.9 (GRID K160Q) — the GRID K160Q offers 237.1% better value. The GRID K160Q is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2010).

FeatureRadeon HD 5600/5700GRID K160Q
MSRP
$99-21%
$125
Avg Price (30d)
$99
$30-70%
Performance per Dollar
6.2
20.9+237%
Codename
Cayman
GK104
Release
December 14 2010
June 28 2013
Ranking
#596
#589