Radeon HD 5770 vs FirePro M40003
Radeon HD 5770
Popular choices:
FirePro M40003
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 5770 is positioned at rank 148 and the FirePro M40003 is on rank 151, so the Radeon HD 5770 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 5770
Performance Per Dollar FirePro M40003
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro M40003 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 5770.
| Insight | Radeon HD 5770 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro M40003 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro M40003 holds the technical lead. Priced at $72 (vs $159), it costs 55% less, resulting in a 123.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 5770 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+123.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($159) | ✅More affordable ($72) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 5770 and FirePro M40003
Radeon HD 5770
The Radeon HD 5770 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,348 points. Launch price was $159.
FirePro M40003
The FirePro M40003 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 27 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,364 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 5770 scores 1,348 and the FirePro M40003 reaches 1,364 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 5770 is built on TeraScale 2 while the FirePro M40003 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (Radeon HD 5770) vs 512 (FirePro M40003). Raw compute: 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 5770) vs 0.6912 TFLOPS (FirePro M40003).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5770 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,348 | 1,364+1% |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 800+56% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.36 TFLOPS+97% | 0.6912 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40+25% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 80 KB | 128 KB+60% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 5770 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 5770 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro M40003 has 4 GB. The FirePro M40003 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5770 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 5770) vs 12 (FirePro M40003). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5770 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.2 | 12+7% |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD 2.2 (Radeon HD 5770) vs VCE 1.0 (FirePro M40003). Decoder: UVD 2.2 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264 (Radeon HD 5770) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (FirePro M40003).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5770 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD 2.2 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 2.2 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 5770 draws 108W versus the FirePro M40003's 33W — a 106.4% difference. The FirePro M40003 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon HD 5770) vs 350W (FirePro M40003). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 208mm vs 82mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Radeon HD 5770 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 108W | 33W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 208mm | 82mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.5 | 41.3+230% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 5770 launched at $159 MSRP and currently averages $159, while the FirePro M40003 launched at $150 and now averages $72. The FirePro M40003 costs 54.7% less ($87 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.5 (Radeon HD 5770) vs 18.9 (FirePro M40003) — the FirePro M40003 offers 122.4% better value. The FirePro M40003 is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2009).
| Feature | Radeon HD 5770 | FirePro M40003 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $159 | $150-6% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $159 | $72-55% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.5 | 18.9+122% |
| Codename | Juniper | Chelsea |
| Release | October 13 2009 | June 27 2012 |
| Ranking | #730 | #752 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 5770 and FirePro M40003
