CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 6250
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon X1600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 6250 is positioned at rank 317 and the Mobility Radeon X1600 is on rank 650, so the Radeon HD 6250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6250
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6250 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X1600.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6250 | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Mobility Radeon X1600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Mobility Radeon X1600 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $50), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 226.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 6250 | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+226.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 6250 and Mobility Radeon X1600
Radeon HD 6250
The Radeon HD 6250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 94 points. Launch price was $299.
Mobility Radeon X1600
The Mobility Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 92 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 6250 scores 94 and the Mobility Radeon X1600 reaches 92 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 6250 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Mobility Radeon X1600 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon HD 6250) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6250) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1600).
| Feature | Radeon HD 6250 | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 94+2% | 92 |
| Architecture | TeraScale 3 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+76% | 800 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.253 TFLOPS+101% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 88+120% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 352 KB+340% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 6250 | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 6250 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon X1600 has 256 MB. The Radeon HD 6250 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6250) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1600) — the Radeon HD 6250 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6250 | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 6250 draws 200W versus the Mobility Radeon X1600's 50W — a 120% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6250) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1600). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6250 | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 50W-75% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.5 | 1.8+260% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 6250 launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Mobility Radeon X1600 launched at $49 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon X1600 costs 70% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.9 (Radeon HD 6250) vs 6.1 (Mobility Radeon X1600) — the Mobility Radeon X1600 offers 221.1% better value.
| Feature | Radeon HD 6250 | Mobility Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $50 | $49-2% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $15-70% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 6.1+221% |
| Codename | Cayman | Broadway |
| Release | December 14 2010 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #623 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 6250 and Mobility Radeon X1600
