Radeon HD 6250 vs Radeon X1600 Pro

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6250 vs Radeon X1600 Pro FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6250 vs Radeon X1600 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6250

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 182.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.

Radeon X1600 Pro

2020

Why buy it

✅Radeon HD 6250 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 Pro is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌
198% HIGHER MSRP
$149 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.7 vs 1.9 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon X1600 Pro is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 5.3% in PassMark G3D (99 vs 94), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon X1600 Pro is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6250 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $99 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 182.9% (1.9 vs 0.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6250 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon X1600 Pro has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 6250 vs Radeon X1600 Pro Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6250

The Radeon HD 6250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 94 points. Launch price was $299.

Radeon X1600 Pro

The Radeon X1600 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 6250 scores 94 versus the Radeon X1600 Pro's 99 — the Radeon X1600 Pro leads by 5.3%. The Radeon HD 6250 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon X1600 Pro uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon HD 6250) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1600 Pro). Raw compute: 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6250) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 Pro). Boost clocks: 800 MHz vs 1560 MHz.

Feature	Radeon HD 6250	Radeon X1600 Pro
G3D Mark Score	94	99+5%
Architecture	TeraScale 3	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1408	2048+45%
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.253 TFLOPS	6.39 TFLOPS+184%
Boost Clock	800 MHz	1560 MHz+95%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	88	128+45%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	3 MB+500%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 6250	Radeon X1600 Pro
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6250 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600 Pro. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 6250) vs 3 MB (Radeon X1600 Pro) — the Radeon X1600 Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 6250	Radeon X1600 Pro
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	3 MB+500%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6250 draws 200W versus the Radeon X1600 Pro's 150W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon X1600 Pro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6250) vs 350W (Radeon X1600 Pro). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon HD 6250	Radeon X1600 Pro
TDP	200W	150W-25%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	0.5	0.7+40%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6250 came in at $50, while the Radeon X1600 Pro launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6250 was 66.4% cheaper ($99 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (Radeon HD 6250) vs 0.7 (Radeon X1600 Pro) — the Radeon HD 6250 offers 171.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1600 Pro (2020 vs 2010).

Feature	Radeon HD 6250	Radeon X1600 Pro
MSRP	$50-66%	$149
Performance per Dollar	1.9+171%	0.7
Codename	Cayman	Navi 10
Release	December 14 2010	January 21 2020
Ranking	#623	#216

Search Radeon HD 6250 on Amazon

Search Radeon X1600 Pro on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.