Radeon HD 3000 vs Radeon HD 6250

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 3000 vs Radeon HD 6250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 3000 vs Radeon HD 6250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 3000

2011

Why buy it

✅More future proof: TeraScale 3 (2010−2013) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 6250

2010

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 3000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.1% in PassMark G3D (96 vs 94), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 3000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2011 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 3000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $50 vs $50, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2.1% (1.9 vs 1.9), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon HD 3000 vs Radeon HD 6250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 3000

The Radeon HD 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 96 points. Launch price was $180.

Radeon HD 6250

The Radeon HD 6250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 94 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 3000 scores 96 and the Radeon HD 6250 reaches 94 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 3000 is built on TeraScale 3 while the Radeon HD 6250 uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 3000) vs 1,408 (Radeon HD 6250). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3000) vs 2.253 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6250).

Feature	Radeon HD 3000	Radeon HD 6250
G3D Mark Score	96+2%	94
Architecture	TeraScale 3	TeraScale 3
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1280	1408+10%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.92 TFLOPS	2.253 TFLOPS+17%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	88+10%
L1 Cache	320 KB	352 KB+10%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 3000	Radeon HD 6250
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3000 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6250.

Feature	Radeon HD 3000	Radeon HD 6250
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 3000 draws 186W versus the Radeon HD 6250's 200W — a 7.3% difference. The Radeon HD 3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 3000) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6250). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Radeon HD 3000	Radeon HD 6250
TDP	186W-7%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	1mm	—
Slots	0	—
Perf/Watt	0.5	0.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 3000 came in at $50, while the Radeon HD 6250 launched at $50. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.9 (Radeon HD 3000) vs 1.9 (Radeon HD 6250) — the Radeon HD 6250 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 3000 (2011 vs 2010).

Feature	Radeon HD 3000	Radeon HD 6250
MSRP	$50	$50
Performance per Dollar	1.9	1.9
Codename	Cayman	Cayman
Release	December 1 2011	December 14 2010
Ranking	#598	#623

Search Radeon HD 3000 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 6250 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.