Radeon 3000 vs Radeon HD 3000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 3000 vs Radeon HD 3000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 3000 vs Radeon HD 3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 3000

2019

Why buy it

✅Radeon HD 3000 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 3000 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 186W, a 136W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Radeon HD 3000

2011

Why buy it

✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌272% higher power demand at 186W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 3000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 3000 instead at 98 vs 96, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 3000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 3000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 3000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 3000 has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 3000 vs Radeon HD 3000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 3000

The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

Radeon HD 3000

The Radeon HD 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 96 points. Launch price was $180.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 3000 scores 98 and the Radeon HD 3000 reaches 96 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 3000 is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon HD 3000 uses TeraScale 3, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3000) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 3000). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000) vs 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 3000).

Feature	Radeon 3000	Radeon HD 3000
G3D Mark Score	98+2%	96
Architecture	GCN 4.0	TeraScale 3
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512	1280+150%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.247 TFLOPS	1.92 TFLOPS+54%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	80+150%
L1 Cache	128 KB	320 KB+150%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 3000	Radeon HD 3000
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 3000 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 3000.

Feature	Radeon 3000	Radeon HD 3000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10_0 (Radeon 3000) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon 3000	Radeon HD 3000
DirectX	10_0	10.0
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Avivo HD (Radeon 3000) vs UVD (Radeon HD 3000). Decoder: Avivo HD vs UVD.

Feature	Radeon 3000	Radeon HD 3000
Encoder	Avivo HD	UVD
Decoder	Avivo HD	UVD

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 3000 draws 50W versus the Radeon HD 3000's 186W — a 115.3% difference. The Radeon 3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3000) vs 350W (Radeon HD 3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

Feature	Radeon 3000	Radeon HD 3000
TDP	50W-73%	186W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Length	1mm	1mm
Slots	0	0
Perf/Watt	2.0+300%	0.5

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 3000 came in at $0, while the Radeon HD 3000 launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon 3000 was 100+% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon 3000) vs 1.9 (Radeon HD 3000) — the Radeon 3000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 3000 (2019 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon 3000	Radeon HD 3000
MSRP	$0-100%	$50
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	1.9
Codename	Polaris 23	Cayman
Release	May 13 2019	December 1 2011
Ranking	#757	#598

Search Radeon 3000 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 3000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.