Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon 3000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon 3000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon 3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX Go1400

2008

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 3000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌200% higher power demand at 150W vs 50W.

Radeon 3000

2019

Why buy it

✅1.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Quadro FX Go1400 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 3000 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 150W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon 3000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX Go1400 instead at 102 vs 98, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 3000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon 3000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon 3000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX Go1400

The Quadro FX Go1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon 3000

The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX Go1400 scores 102 and the Radeon 3000 reaches 98 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX Go1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon 3000 uses GCN 4.0, both on 55 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 512 (Radeon 3000). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000).

Feature	Quadro FX Go1400	Radeon 3000
G3D Mark Score	102+4%	98
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	55 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	192	512+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4623 TFLOPS	1.247 TFLOPS+170%
ROPs	24+50%	16
TMUs	64+100%	32
L2 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX Go1400	Radeon 3000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX Go1400 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 3000 carries 512 MB. Quadro FX Go1400 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX Go1400 and 64-bit on the Radeon 3000. L2 Cache: 192 KB (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 512 KB (Radeon 3000) — the Radeon 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX Go1400	Radeon 3000
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	192 KB	512 KB+167%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX Go1400 draws 150W versus the Radeon 3000's 50W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 3000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 350W (Radeon 3000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX Go1400	Radeon 3000
TDP	150W	50W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	0.7	2.0+186%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 3000 (2019 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX Go1400	Radeon 3000
MSRP	—	$0
Codename	GT200B	Polaris 23
Release	November 11 2008	May 13 2019
Ranking	#884	#757

Search Quadro FX Go1400 on Amazon

Search Radeon 3000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.