Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon X1600 Pro

NVIDIA

Quadro FX Go1400

2008Core: 602 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1600 Pro

2020Core: 1130 MHzBoost: 1560 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon X1600 Pro Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon X1600 Pro FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon X1600 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX Go1400

2008

Why buy it

  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon X1600 Pro across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon X1600 Pro

2020

Why buy it

  • 2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Quadro FX Go1400 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 Pro is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1600 Pro is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX Go1400 instead at 102 vs 99, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon X1600 Pro is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1600 Pro makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon X1600 Pro Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX Go1400

The Quadro FX Go1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points. Launch price was $1,799.

AMD

Radeon X1600 Pro

The Radeon X1600 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX Go1400 scores 102 and the Radeon X1600 Pro reaches 99 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX Go1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon X1600 Pro uses RDNA 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1600 Pro). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 Pro).

FeatureQuadro FX Go1400Radeon X1600 Pro
G3D Mark Score
102+3%
99
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
55 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
192
2048+967%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.4623 TFLOPS
6.39 TFLOPS+1282%
ROPs
24
64+167%
TMUs
64
128+100%
L2 Cache
0.19 MB
3 MB+1479%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX Go1400Radeon X1600 Pro
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX Go1400 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 Pro carries 512 MB. Quadro FX Go1400 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX Go1400 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600 Pro. L2 Cache: 0.19 MB (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 3 MB (Radeon X1600 Pro) — the Radeon X1600 Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX Go1400Radeon X1600 Pro
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
0.19 MB
3 MB+1479%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX Go1400 draws 150W versus the Radeon X1600 Pro's 150W — a 0% difference. The Radeon X1600 Pro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 350W (Radeon X1600 Pro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro FX Go1400Radeon X1600 Pro
TDP
150W
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
0.7
0.7
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon X1600 Pro (2020 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX Go1400Radeon X1600 Pro
MSRP
$149
Codename
GT200B
Navi 10
Release
November 11 2008
January 21 2020
Ranking
#884
#216

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.