
Quadro FX Go1400

Radeon X1600 Pro
Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon X1600 Pro Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon X1600 Pro FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon X1600 Pro: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX Go1400
2008Why buy it
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon X1600 Pro across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
Radeon X1600 Pro
2020Why buy it
- ✅2.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Quadro FX Go1400 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 Pro is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX Go1400 vs Radeon X1600 Pro Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX Go1400
The Quadro FX Go1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Radeon X1600 Pro
The Radeon X1600 Pro is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX Go1400 scores 102 and the Radeon X1600 Pro reaches 99 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX Go1400 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon X1600 Pro uses RDNA 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 192 (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 2,048 (Radeon X1600 Pro). Raw compute: 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 6.39 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600 Pro).
| Feature | Quadro FX Go1400 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 102+3% | 99 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 2048+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4623 TFLOPS | 6.39 TFLOPS+1282% |
| ROPs | 24 | 64+167% |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.19 MB | 3 MB+1479% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX Go1400 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX Go1400 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 Pro carries 512 MB. Quadro FX Go1400 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX Go1400 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600 Pro. L2 Cache: 0.19 MB (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 3 MB (Radeon X1600 Pro) — the Radeon X1600 Pro has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX Go1400 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+700% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.19 MB | 3 MB+1479% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX Go1400 draws 150W versus the Radeon X1600 Pro's 150W — a 0% difference. The Radeon X1600 Pro is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX Go1400) vs 350W (Radeon X1600 Pro). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX Go1400 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.7 | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon X1600 Pro (2020 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX Go1400 | Radeon X1600 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $149 |
| Codename | GT200B | Navi 10 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | January 21 2020 |
| Ranking | #884 | #216 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














