Quadro FX 570M
VS
Quadro FX Go1400

Quadro FX 570M vs Quadro FX Go1400

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 570M

2008Core: 610 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro FX Go1400

2008Core: 602 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro FX 570M is positioned at rank 404 and the Quadro FX Go1400 is on rank 349, so the Quadro FX Go1400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 570M

#389
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
73865%
#404
Quadro FX 570M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#405
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
100%
#406
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
100%
#407
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
90%
#408
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
85%
#410
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
80%
#411
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
80%
#413
GRID P4-1Q
MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185
60%
#416
GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500
50%
#417
GRID M60-0B
MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900
45%
#418
Quadro FX 4500 X2
MSRP: $2799|Avg: $2799
40%
#419
Quadro FX 5500
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30
40%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX Go1400

#334
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
14483%
#349
Quadro FX Go1400
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#350
GRID K520
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $50
96%
#351
GRID P40-12Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
95%
#352
FirePro 2270
MSRP: $149|Avg: $30
93%
#353
FirePro 2460
MSRP: $180|Avg: $10
92%
#355
Quadro FX 580
MSRP: $199|Avg: $500
89%
#356
FirePro 3D V5700
MSRP: $599|Avg: $25
89%
#357
GRID M60-1B
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120
88%
#359
FireStream 9270
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20
87%
#360
Quadro 400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $500
86%
#361
FirePro 2260
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
86%
#362
Quadro FX 380 LP
MSRP: $169|Avg: $15
84%
#364
Quadro FX 1800
MSRP: $489|Avg: $100
79%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX Go1400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 570M.

InsightQuadro FX 570MQuadro FX Go1400
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3%)
Leading raw performance (+3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+700%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX Go1400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro FX 570M and Quadro FX Go1400

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 570M

The Quadro FX 570M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 99 points. Launch price was $3,499.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX Go1400

The Quadro FX Go1400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 102 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 570M scores 99 and the Quadro FX Go1400 reaches 102 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 570M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Quadro FX Go1400 uses Tesla 2.0, both on a 55 nm process. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 570M) vs 192 (Quadro FX Go1400). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 570M) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro FX Go1400).

FeatureQuadro FX 570MQuadro FX Go1400
G3D Mark Score
99
102+3%
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
55 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
240+25%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS+35%
0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs
32+33%
24
TMUs
80+25%
64
L2 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 570MQuadro FX Go1400
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 570M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX Go1400 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX Go1400 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 570M) vs 192 KB (Quadro FX Go1400) — the Quadro FX 570M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 570MQuadro FX Go1400
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+33%
192 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 570M draws 189W versus the Quadro FX Go1400's 150W — a 23% difference. The Quadro FX Go1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 570M) vs 350W (Quadro FX Go1400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro FX 570MQuadro FX Go1400
TDP
189W
150W-21%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
0.5
0.7+40%